Validity of Acoustic Weapon Effects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversial biological effects of acoustic weapons, with conflicting scientific articles highlighting potential harm such as nausea, gagging, and disorientation. Many of these studies are older or stem from government reports and military sources, leading to uncertainty about their validity. There is skepticism regarding sensational claims made by conspiracy theorists, and the media's portrayal of these weapons is also questioned. The conversation references specific articles that argue both for and against the effectiveness of acoustic weapons, particularly concerning infrasound. Notably, the use of such weapons for riot control in the U.S. has been documented, and the ACLU has prepared a response regarding their implications. Additionally, there are claims about the use of acoustic weapons against diplomats in Cuba, which have sparked further debate about their reliability and impact. Overall, the topic remains contentious with no clear consensus on the effects of acoustic weapons.
chemisthypnos
Note: this is a re-post from the physics area because this thread is probably more appropriate for this content.

There is a lot of rather contradictory information present on the biological effects of acoustic weapons with a bevy of scientific articles claiming that they cause harm to biological organisms with effects such as nausia, gagging, and disorientation. These articles are mostly from older scientific articles and modern government scientific reports on the issue, and statements by military leaders overseeing the development of the weapons (including defence contractors). Contradictory claims are also being made by a multitude of scientific sources from a variety of different countries and backgrounds.

I am not sure which one is correct after reading about a dozen articles from both sides. Does anyone have any insight on this issue?

Of note, there are a multitude of crackpots and conspiracy theorists that believe that the acoustic weapons are real and can do outworldly things- the media seems to have bought into these speculations thouroughly and should probably not be trusted.

Here are two articles (one claiming they work and the other denying it especially pertaining to infrasound):

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...oolever).pdf&usg=AOvVaw1lN5i64oG06oD52eJZOYRo

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...9altmann.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Nro8eXDizm43lgLukgW4z
 
Biology news on Phys.org
All I know is that use of such weapons has been reported in the US as riot-control in e.g., Ferguson MO,

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ound_cannons_were_used_for_crowd_control.html

and that the ACLU has prepared a response:

https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/acoustic_weapons.pdf

These seem to be hearing-range acoustic devices. (there are yootooobe videos showing such devices and their use)
Infrasound? I know they DO cause an emotional response (you've probably experienced it in action and horror movies in a high-end theater), but damage, etc... don't know for sure...

at least the Federal Gov't (yeah- that highly reliable source of alternative facts...) asserts that these have been used against US and Canadian diplomats in Cuba. That assertion has been questioned.

http://www.iflscience.com/technology/sonic-weapons-attack-american-diplomats-cuba/

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top