Vapor pressure given boiling point and heat of vaporization?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the vapor pressure of benzene at 50.0°C, the Clausius–Clapeyron equation is applicable, which relates vapor pressure to temperature and heat of vaporization. The boiling point of benzene is 80.1°C, and its heat of vaporization is 31 kJ/mol. The equation ln P = -(Hvap)/RT + C can be used, where P is the vapor pressure, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin. The constant C can be determined using known values at a specific temperature. Understanding the definition of boiling point is also crucial, as it indicates the temperature at which the vapor pressure equals atmospheric pressure.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



What is the vapor pressure of benzene at 50.0 C? Benzene's boiling point is 80.1 C and its heat of vaporization is 31 kJ/mol

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't want to be that guy who just says "I don't know" but.. All I know is that:

ln P = -(Hvap)/RT + C (and I don't know what C is besides "constant.")

and

ln(p1/p2) = Hvap/R (T1-T2/T1T2) but this relates the vapor pressure at different temperatures..

I am really not good at these applied things... any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right about trying to use Clausius–Clapeyron relation. What is the definition of a boiling point?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top