Variable dielectric permitivity

lanwatch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The dielectric permitivity need not be a constant. Typically one can find problems where the permitivity varies, but always does so in the direction of the field. I came up with a problem that may (or may not) be solvable without the use of numerical methods.

Consider a spherical capacitor formed by two concentric spheres of radii 'a' and 'b'. The dielectric filling the volume between both spheres has permitivity given by

\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0 (2+\cos(\theta))

Find the capacity of the setup.

The Attempt at a Solution



Still at it, I am trying to decompose the dielectric in sections between two discrete θs and apply the constitutive equations, and then trying to reduce it to a PDE.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi lanwatch! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have an epsilon: ε and a theta: θ :wink:)

can't you treat it as lots of very thin capacitors in parallel, and integrate to find the total capacitance?
 
That was my first thought, but you need to prove before that the field is radial. To me that is not obvious...
 
Last edited:
hi lanwatch! :smile:

(i'm very sorry i didn't reply earlier … somehow i lost this thread :redface:)
lanwatch said:
That was my first thought, but you need to prove before that the field is radial. To me that is not obvious...

but the electric displacement field (D) is unaffected by the dielectric, so that will be radial, and we are given that the permittivity is scalar, so the E electric field will always be parallel to the D field :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top