Variational Principle: Find Best Bound State for 1D Harmonic Oscillator

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38

Homework Statement



Find the best bound state on Egs for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form

\psi(x) = \frac{A}{x^2 + b^2}

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.

Homework Equations



The variational principle

\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle \geq E_{gs}

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem has some really nasty integrals. E.g., just to normalize the wavefunction, you need to calculate:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2 + b^2)^2}

I was able to find most of them using residue theory. It was a last resort...the only method I could think of! I had to dig through my old complex analysis notes to remind myself of the technique using a semicircular contour of radius r and then letting r go to infinity. The integral of f(z) over the arc is zero, leaving the integral on the real axis, which is the part I want to evaluate. Anyway, I'm actually pretty sure of my answers, which are as follows

The best value of b is:

b^2 = \frac{\hbar}{m\omega \sqrt{2}}

\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle = \frac{\hbar \omega}{\sqrt{2}} \geq E_{gs}

My question is, in a subsequent problem, Griffiths asks us to generalize this to a trial wavefunction of the form

\psi(x) = \frac{A}{(x^2 + b^2)^n}

Huh? Did I miss something?! I had enough trouble with the integrals the first time around! I don't think contour integration is going to help me. Am I missing some more obvious method for evaluating these integrals?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That first integral is more easily done with the substitution x=tan y, and some trig.
 
hmm...you're right that does work rather nicely. Not too sure about the general case though.
 
cepheid said:

Homework Statement



Find the best bound state on Egs for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form

\psi(x) = \frac{A}{x^2 + b^2}

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.


Homework Equations



The variational principle

\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle \geq E_{gs}


The Attempt at a Solution



This problem has some really nasty integrals. E.g., just to normalize the wavefunction, you need to calculate:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2 + b^2)^2}

I was able to find most of them using residue theory. It was a last resort...the only method I could think of! I had to dig through my old complex analysis notes to remind myself of the technique using a semicircular contour of radius r and then letting r go to infinity. The integral of f(z) over the arc is zero, leaving the integral on the real axis, which is the part I want to evaluate. Anyway, I'm actually pretty sure of my answers, which are as follows

The best value of b is:

b^2 = \frac{\hbar}{m\omega \sqrt{2}}

\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle = \frac{\hbar \omega}{\sqrt{2}} \geq E_{gs}

My question is, in a subsequent problem, Griffiths asks us to generalize this to a trial wavefunction of the form

\psi(x) = \frac{A}{(x^2 + b^2)^n}

Huh? Did I miss something?! I had enough trouble with the integrals the first time around! I don't think contour integration is going to help me. Am I missing some more obvious method for evaluating these integrals?

note that

\frac{1}{(x^2+b^2)^3} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{db^2} ( \frac{1}{(x^2+b^2)^2})

You can generalize to an arbitrary n. Therefore, if you know how to integrate with 1/(b^2+x^2), you can integrate any power n. Your result will contain the nth derivative which you can probably find explicitly (it depends, what is the result of the integral with 1/(x^2+b^2) ?)
 
Not to grave dig here too bad, but I don't think the OP came to the right solution and I didn't want someone else to be confused.

The ground state energy of a harmonic oscillator is known to be

E_{gs}=\frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega &gt;<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \hbar \omega

The variational principle can only find a lower bound on the energy, meaning that the approximation must be greater than or equal to the actual energy of the system.

Working out the problem myself, I got a little different value of b. I believe this is where the OP went wrong.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top