Vector Boson Propagator and gauge

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Well I'm trying to understand the difference between these propagators:

\frac{g_{\mu \nu}}{k^{2} - m^2 + i \epsilon}

and

\frac{g_{\mu \nu}+ \frac{ k_{\mu} k_{\nu}}{m^{2}}}{k^{2} - m^2 + i \epsilon}

My professor told me that they are different gauges, and the from the second you rule out the goldstone modes. Can someone explain it to me a little better or refer me to some textbook? I don't also get the meaning of goldstone modes- if you have a massive vector boson then you don't have goldstone modes [they become the longitudial dofs]

Also I am having one more question. If the first doesn't kill out the goldstone bosons, then can someone -after arriving at the end result- kill them? Maybe by a gauge transformation? and what gauge transformation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisVer said:
Well I'm trying to understand the difference between these propagators:

\frac{g_{\mu \nu}}{k^{2} - m^2 + i \epsilon}

and

\frac{g_{\mu \nu}+ \frac{ k_{\mu} k_{\nu}}{m^{2}}}{k^{2} - m^2 + i \epsilon}

My professor told me that they are different gauges, and the from the second you rule out the goldstone modes. Can someone explain it to me a little better or refer me to some textbook? I don't also get the meaning of goldstone modes- if you have a massive vector boson then you don't have goldstone modes [they become the longitudial dofs]

Also I am having one more question. If the first doesn't kill out the goldstone bosons, then can someone -after arriving at the end result- kill them? Maybe by a gauge transformation? and what gauge transformation?

I am not sure what your prof meant by "killing off the Goldstone modes". The two expressions correspond to different gauges. If you put a parameter ##\xi## in front of the ##k^\mu k^\nu## term, upon summing up any gauge invariant combination of Feynman diagrams (in particular the sum of the diagrams of a given loop order), the ##\xi## dependent terms will cancel out, showing that adding that term does not change anything to the final result. I guess it is possible to think of these extra terms as being associate to the Goldstone modes (like some pieces of the ##g^{\mu \nu}## piece in QED correspond to the longitudinal modes) .
 
You need to look at a QFT text for details; try Srednicki.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
931
Back
Top