Vector calc, gradient vector fields

calculusisrad
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is F = (2ye^x)i + x(sin2y)j + 18k a gradient vector field?



The Attempt at a Solution



Yeah I just don't know...I started to find some partial derivatives but I really don't know what to do here. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi calculusisrad! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

learn: div(curl) = 0, curl(grad) = 0

does that help? :smile:
 
For any g(x,y), \nabla g= \partial g/\partial x\vec{i}+ \partial g/\partial y\vec{j}+ \partial g/\partial z\vec{k}.

So is there a function g such that
\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}= 2ye^x
\frac{\partial g}{\partial z}= 18
and
\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}= x sin(2y)? One way to answer that is to try to find g by finding anti-derivatives. Another is to use the fact that as long as the derivatives are continuous (which is the case here), the mixed second derivatives are equal:
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}\right)= \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\right)
Is
\frac{\partial x sin(2y)}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial 2ye^x}{\partial y}?
etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you soo much :)
I am still confused, though. So if I can prove that dg/dxy = dg/dyx and dg/dxz = dg/dzx and dg/dyz = dg/dzy , I will have proved that F is a gradient vector field, correct?

I found that dg/dxy = sin2y, and d/dyx = 2e^x. Since they are not equal, that means that F is not a gradient vector field?

Thanks
 
hi calculusisrad! :smile:

(have a curly d: ∂ and try using the X2 and X2 buttons just above the Reply box :wink:)
calculusisrad said:
So if I can prove that dg/dxy = dg/dyx and dg/dxz = dg/dzx and dg/dyz = dg/dzy , I will have proved that F is a gradient vector field, correct?

(your notation is terrible , but …) yes :smile:

this is because you're actually proving that curlF = 0,

and if F is a gradient, then F = ∇φ, and so curlF = (curl∇)φ = 0 :wink:
I found that dg/dxy = sin2y, and d/dyx = 2e^x. Since they are not equal, that means that F is not a gradient vector field?

yup :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top