Vector Calculus: Calculate Work via Line Integral from (-1,2) to (1,3)

mikeyrichster
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A force is applied to a particle, defined by:

F(x,y)= (y^2, 2xy) << This is a verticle bracket with the y^2 ontop of the 2xy

The path of the particle is straight. The particle moves from (-1,2) to (1,3)

i) Calculate the work that the force F does as the particle moves along the path C by evaluating the appropreate line integral directly


I don't know where to start with this. I know that work: w = fd so to get the distance i must do some integration, but how do you integrate a vector like that?


Can somone please help!? - would be much appreciated


Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikeyrichster said:

Homework Statement



A force is applied to a particle, defined by:

F(x,y)= (y^2, 2xy) << This is a verticle bracket with the y^2 ontop of the 2xy

What do you mean by that? Force is a vector, not a fraction?
The path of the particle is straight. The particle moves from (-1,2) to (1,3)

i) Calculate the work that the force F does as the particle moves along the path C by evaluating the appropreate line integral directly


I don't know where to start with this. I know that work: w = fd so to get the distance i must do some integration, but how do you integrate a vector like that?

w = fd only works for constant forces along straight lines. Perhaps you mean

W = \int_C \vec F \cdot d\vec R
 
Hi there! thanks for your help

sorry about the fraction thing.. what i ment was that it is a vector but written vertically not horizontally... so still a vector but not (y^2, 2xy) .. I am damn useless at LaTeX so i can't make it with a large bracket and the y^2 at the top and the 2xy at the bottom.. hope that makes sense

Also i was only making a guess with the w=fd thing, I am sure your expression is what I am looking for as it uses vectors.

What would be the next logical thing to do with it?

Thanks again
 
Click on the formula below to see the LaTeX for writing the column vector.

\textbf{F} = \begin{pmatrix} y^2 \\ 2xy \end{pmatrix}
 
mikeyrichster said:
What would be the next logical thing to do with it?

Thanks again

Parameterize the line as

\vec R(t) = \langle x(t), y(t), z(t)\rangle

and use

\int_C \vec F \cdot d\vec R = \int_a^b \vec F(t)\cdot \frac {d\vec R}{dt}\, dt
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top