Vector Calculus: Change of Variables problem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a double integral over a triangular region using a change of variables with substitutions u=y-x and v=y+x. The user initially calculated the Jacobian as 1, which is incorrect, but this error does not affect the convergence of the integral. They reported an undefined final solution due to encountering a log(0) issue, indicating a problem in their computations. Forum participants emphasized the need for detailed intermediate steps to identify errors in the user's approach, particularly in the inner integral calculation. The correct answer to the integral is 1/4(e-1/e).
Tom31415926535
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let D be the triangle with vertices (0,0), (1,0) and (0,1). Evaluate:

∫∫exp((y-x)/(y+x))dxdy for D

by making the substitutions u=y-x and v=y+x

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So first I found an equation for y and x respectively:

y=(u+v)/2 and x=(v-u)/2

Then I found the Jacobian of this transformation to be 1.

Then I started solving using the terminals as:

-v<u<v and 0<v<1

However, the final solution that I got is undefined (however I can see I was on the right track. The only issue is that there was a log(0) that screwed things up)

Where have I gone wrong?

The correct answer is 1/4(e-1/e)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are we going to be able to know where you went wrong when you only describe your attempt in vague terms? Please show us your actual computations including your intermediate steps.

Tom31415926535 said:
Then I found the Jacobian of this transformation to be 1.
This is incorrect, but does not affect the whether your integral converges or not. Again, in order to have a chance at knowing how you went wrong, we need to see your intermediate steps.
 
IMG_0810.jpg
IMG_0811.jpg


You make a good point. Here are my steps
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0811.jpg
    IMG_0811.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 279
  • IMG_0810.jpg
    IMG_0810.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 326
It would be much better and more in line with forum rules if you typed it out instead of just attaching images (see Guidelines for students and helpers, point 5). One issue is that it is impossible to quote a particular line of your computations.

Regarding the Jacobian: What is ##0.5 \cdot 0.5##?

Regarding your integral: Your inner integral is not correctly done.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K