Vector Confusion In Applying Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Coulomb's Law and the confusion surrounding the constants in front of the trigonometric functions used in the calculations. Participants clarify that these constants arise from the distances and magnitudes of the charges involved, specifically noting that the factors of 1 and 2 represent the charges rather than distances. The resolution of electric fields into unit vector components along the x and y directions is emphasized, with attention to the squared distances in the denominator. A participant initially questions the sign of the constants in front of the sine functions but later realizes that all y components are positive due to the direction of the vectors. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector resolution and the role of charge magnitudes in electric field calculations.
PurelyPhysical
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/48cLE6q

Homework Equations


Coulomb's law

The Attempt at a Solution


I can follow most of this problem, but I am unsure where the constants in front of the trig functions are coming from. Why is it 2cos(135), 1cos(45), 2cos(-45), etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PurelyPhysical said:
I can follow most of this problem, but I am unsure where the constants in front of the trig functions are coming from. Why is it 2cos(135), 1cos(45), 2cos(-45), etc?

pl. write down the electric field due to charges placed at those points on an unit positive charge placed at the coordinate under consideration, you will need the the distance square in the denominator and the field has been resolved in unit vector i and j directions...the factor 2 and i are coming due to those distances...
e.g. take the charge at a... it is distant sqrt(2)/2 ; take square then it will be 1/2 in the denominator so a factor of 2 in the numerator-resolve the field intensity in i and j direction along x and y respectively.

similarly check other ones.
 
drvrm said:
pl. write down the electric field due to charges placed at those points on an unit positive charge placed at the coordinate under consideration, you will need the the distance square in the denominator and the field has been resolved in unit vector i and j directions...the factor 2 and i are coming due to those distances...
e.g. take the charge at a... it is distant sqrt(2)/2 ; take square then it will be 1/2 in the denominator so a factor of 2 in the numerator-resolve the field intensity in i and j direction along x and y respectively.

similarly check other ones.

Why are there two distances 2 and 1? Isn't the center point equally distant from all the other points?

edit: I wrote down the electric field. I see now where the constants in front of the cos are coming from. But is there a sign error for the constants in front of sin?
 
Last edited:
check the full expression!
 
drvrm said:
check the full expression!

I see it now. What I didn't realize is that all of the y vectors are positive because the third vector points away from the positive charge. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
PurelyPhysical said:
Why are there two distances 2 and 1?
There are not two distances. Factors 1 and 2 are the charges. The factors for the displacements are 2 (1/r2), the unit vectors ##\hat i## and ##\hat j## and the trig components, sin and cos..
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top