Vector Equation for Force Between Electric Dipoles

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
(All the variables are vectors, I just didn't feel like fumbling around with the LateX code to make them vectors. Its late and I'm tired a lazy!)

Homework Statement


(This is paraphrased)
There are two dipoles with arbitrary direction to each other. You know the energy between the dipoles is..

W_D=-p \cdot E

What is the force between them? F_{1,2}

Homework Equations


Force:
F=-\nabla W_D

Electric Field of a Dipole:
E=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r^3}[3p \cdot a_r-p]

a_r is the unit vector from p1 to p2.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the following vector identity..
\nabla (a \cdot b)=(a \cdot \nabla)b+(b \cdot \nabla)a+a×(\nabla × b)+b×(\nabla × a)

-\nabla (-p \cdot E)=\nabla (p \cdot E)=(p \cdot \nabla)E+(E \cdot \nabla)p+p×(\nabla × E)+E×(\nabla ×p)

So I know \nabla × E =0 and E×(\nabla ×p)=(E \cdot p)\nabla-(E \cdot \nabla)p

So plugging these in, I get.

F=(p \cdot \nabla)E+(E \cdot p)\nabla

The prof gives the answer as, F=(p \cdot \nabla)E

So that means (E \cdot p)\nabla=0 But I cannot figure out why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:
Its late and I'm tired a lazy!

Sounds French.:-p

E×(\nabla ×p)=(E \cdot p)\nabla-(E \cdot \nabla)p

A vector differential operator does not a vector make. You cannot use the familiar BAC-CAB identity when one of the operands is not really a vector. Instead, what would you expect the curl of a point dipole to be?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
A vector differential operator does not a vector make. You cannot use the familiar BAC-CAB identity when one of the operands is not really a vector. Instead, what would you expect the curl of a point dipole to be?

Hmm... I think I would expect it to be zero. But I am not sure. :\
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top