Vectors in different planes add up to give a zero resultant?

AI Thread Summary
Three or four vectors in different planes can indeed add up to give a zero resultant, provided they are arranged correctly in three-dimensional space. The discussion highlights that while vectors can be resolved into components along the i, j, and k axes, they must not all lie in the same defined plane to satisfy the problem's conditions. For example, two vectors can define a plane, and a third vector must not be in that same plane to achieve a zero resultant. The concept of a "crooked" plane is introduced, suggesting that vectors can still be in a single plane even if they don't align with the standard xy, xz, or yz planes. Overall, the arrangement and orientation of the vectors are crucial for achieving a zero resultant.
xphloem
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can
1. three
2. four
vectors in different planes add up to give a zero resultant?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1. Yes.
2. Yes.

1. suppose that we resolve the 3 vectors in i,j,k components. Putting each one of them zero in the respective three vectors to make them in 3 separate plane. Cant they be zero?
2. similar as above. the only thing is that the fourth vector has none of its components zero.



Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pl reply me
 
Hi xphloem,

For #1, were you thinking of something like this:

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \vec A &amp;= (1,1,0)\nonumber\\<br /> \vec B &amp;= (-1,0,1)\nonumber\\<br /> \vec C &amp;= (0,-1,-1)\nonumber<br /> \end{align}<br />

They definitely add to zero, but they are in a single plane, so they don't satisfy the requirements of the problem.

For this problem: if you start with any two vectors, they define a plane. Then you want a third vector that is not in that same plane. Can those add to zero?
 
alphysicist said:
Hi xphloem,

For #1, were you thinking of something like this:

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \vec A &amp;= (1,1,0)\nonumber\\<br /> \vec B &amp;= (-1,0,1)\nonumber\\<br /> \vec C &amp;= (0,-1,-1)\nonumber<br /> \end{align}<br />

They definitely add to zero, but they are in a single plane, so they don't satisfy the requirements of the problem.

For this problem: if you start with any two vectors, they define a plane. Then you want a third vector that is not in that same plane. Can those add to zero?

How can all of them be in one plane
the first on is in xy plane
second one in xz plane
and the third in yz plane
am I wrong?
 
The three (essentially only 2) vectors A, B and C together form a 'new' plane, not like the xy, xz or yz plane, but you can also have a 'crooked' plane for example. Then they are still in the same plane, even though the plane is not the xy, yz or zx plane..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top