Vectors in spherical coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of the polarization vector \(\epsilon\) in spherical coordinates and the confusion surrounding its notation. The textbook provides expressions for the spherical components of \(\epsilon\) in terms of Cartesian components, specifically \(\epsilon_1\), \(\epsilon_0\), and \(\epsilon_{-1}\). Clarification is offered regarding the notation, as subscripts can vary between sources, leading to misunderstandings. The correct spherical representation is restated, aligning the components with their respective Cartesian equivalents. Understanding these notations is crucial for studying selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi! I'm studying the selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms. In the textbook it is said: "It is convenient to introduce the spherical components of the vector \epsilon which are given in terms of its Cartesian components by:

\epsilon_1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

Can you please explain me these expressions?
I thought that
\epsilon_1=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_2=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_3=cos\theta

so I can't understand the expressions given in the textbookP.s. \epsilon is the polarization vector, so it's a unit vector
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eoghan said:
Hi! I'm studying the selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms. In the textbook it is said: "It is convenient to introduce the spherical components of the vector \epsilon which are given in terms of its Cartesian components by:

\epsilon_1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

Can you please explain me these expressions?
I thought that
\epsilon_1=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_2=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_3=cos\theta

so I can't understand the expressions given in the textbook


P.s. \epsilon is the polarization vector, so it's a unit vector

It looks like you are confused about notation and I don't blame you. Sometimes subscripts 1,2,3 are used respectively for x,y,z and sometimes not. The confusion arises when you consult different sources using differing notations. Let me recast the unit vectors as follows:

\epsilon_+=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

where

\epsilon_x=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_y=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_z=cos\theta

This should keep the meanings of the subscripts clear for you.
 
Thank you!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top