Vectors Q: Solving OR & OP | Homework Forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eysz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a vector equation involving OR, OP, and PR. The user successfully derived an expression for OR but struggled with further simplification. They proposed substituting t=10 into the equation to express OR in terms of b, leading to a potential result of 4b. The response clarified that the direction of the vectors is crucial for the solution, emphasizing that OR must align with b. The user confirmed their understanding after this explanation.
Eysz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
NOTE: Thread was moved to Homework forums and thus has no homework template...

7MHpMAN.jpg


I managed to find (a) but i couldn't figure out (b).

I think OR = OP + PR = (2/3)a + t( (-1/15)a + (2/5)b) but i don't know how to go further please guide or help me with this please. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a useful, directly observable, relationship between ##\vec{OR}## and b.
 
haruspex said:
There's a useful, directly observable, relationship between ##\vec{OR}## and b.

Then i should just substitute t=10 into the OR= (2/3)a + t( (-1/15)a + (2/5)b) since the answer must be in terms of b. That would make it 4b.

Is it correct?
 
Eysz said:
Then i should just substitute t=10 into the OR= (2/3)a + t( (-1/15)a + (2/5)b) since the answer must be in terms of b. That would make it 4b.

Is it correct?
Yes, but not because you are told the answer must be in terms of b. You know from the diagram that it must be in the direction of b. Unless a and b are in the same direction, how else will you get (2/3)a + t( (-1/15)a + (2/5)b) to be a scalar multiple of b?
 
  • Like
Likes Eysz
haruspex said:
Yes, but not because you are told the answer must be in terms of b. You know from the diagram that it must be in the direction of b. Unless a and b are in the same direction, how else will you get (2/3)a + t( (-1/15)a + (2/5)b) to be a scalar multiple of b?

I completely understand now! Thanks!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top