Velocity and position as functions of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the velocity and position of a neutron traveling through a material, influenced by a resistive force proportional to the square of its speed. The initial calculations for velocity, v(t), were deemed dimensionally correct, but the position function, x(t), raised concerns due to dimensional inconsistencies. Participants clarified the integration process, emphasizing the need to correctly apply limits and logarithmic properties to resolve the discrepancies in the position equation. The conversation highlighted the importance of ensuring that both sides of the equation maintain consistent units throughout the calculations. Ultimately, the participants worked towards confirming the validity of the derived functions while addressing integration techniques.
Talltunetalk
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that a neutron with with mass M and initial speed v0 is traveling through a material, such as graphite. As the neutron moves, it makes collisions with atoms in the material, so teh faster it is moving, the more collisions it makes per unit time. Another model of teh net effect of this is that the neutron experiences a resistive force proportional to the square of its speed, e.g., the force exerted by the material on teh neutron goes like F=-bv^2. Determine the velocity and position of the neutron as a function of time??

Homework Equations


F=-bv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the velocity and got v(t)= m/[bt+(m/v0)] and this makes sense dimensionally at t=0 v=v0 but when i calculated the position I got x(t)= m/b [ln(bt+(m/v0))]+C .. The problem is this does not make sense dimensionally and conceptually.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully others will correct this if it is wrong. After you integrated you had limits of integration, 0 to x and 0 to t. You should be subtracting a term ln(m/v0) and as lna - lnb = ln[a/b] the units will cancel inside the ln. I think your function is OK?

Good luck!

See,

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1331961
 
im sorry where did you get the lna -lnb cause i am adding bt +(m/v0) inside the ln and i don't think you can separate the two into ln(bt) + ln(m/v0)..
 
I think you are integrating between limits, on the left side from 0 to x and on the right side from time = 0 to t. There will be a difference of two terms on the right hand side, x(t) - x(0) = something like

ln(bt+(m/v0)) - ln(b*0+(m/v0)) = ln[(bt+(m/v0))/(m/v0)]

The units cancel, that was what you were confused about?
 
I understand now thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top