Velocity Charged Particle between Parallel Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a charged particle between parallel plates, focusing on the effects of charge polarity on the equations derived. The user initially struggles with part (b) due to negative charge leading to imaginary velocity solutions, prompting a reevaluation of the equations. Clarification is provided that the electric field direction must be considered, resulting in a negative sign for the electric field when the charge is positive. This understanding resolves the confusion regarding the acceleration and direction of the force acting on the charge. Ultimately, the user recognizes that a negative charge would yield real solutions, aligning with the physics of the scenario.
ItsTheSebbe
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


7dc20edd5e.jpg

Can't really find out b, probably due to a mistake in a. Was wondering what I did wrong.

Homework Equations


Kinematic equations of motion, w/ constant a
##F=qE##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
(a)
##E=\frac {\Delta V} {\Delta d}= \frac {V_R-V_L} {L} = \frac {V_0}{L} ##
##F=qE=q \frac {V_0} {L}##
##a=\frac F m =\frac {qV_0} {mL}##
##L=\frac 1 2 a t^2= \frac 1 2 \frac {qV_0} {mL} t^2 \rightarrow t=\sqrt {\frac {2mL^2} {qV_0}}##
##v=at=\frac {qV_0} {mL} \sqrt {\frac {2mL^2} {qV_0}}##

(b)
This is where I'm confused, since filling in a negative charge in this equation will cause solutions for the velocity to be imaginary, which well... Doesn't really work. That makes me guess that the equation is wrong.

(c)
from part (a):
##t=\sqrt {\frac {2mL^2} {qV_0}}##PS: sidequestion, how could I format those equations better, as they seem too cramped for my liking? I know you can use $$'s, but that makes the lines spread out too much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is a vector, and as such has a direction associated with it. When you calculate the force as F = qE there are assumptions being made about how the direction of E relates to your chosen coordinate system.

Make a sketch that includes a vector showing the direction of E when your ##V_o## is greater than zero. What sign should you give E to make it correspond to your choice of coordinate directions?
 
Well since ##V_0=V_R-V_L## and ##V_0>0## The potential in ##V_R## should be higher than in ##V_L## so we'de get an homogeneous electric field from ##V_R## to ##V_L## like this:
fd243b07eb.png

Since the charge will go in the direction of the electric field if q is positive, shouldn't we just take a positive sign?
 
ItsTheSebbe said:
Since the charge will go in the direction of the electric field if q is positive, shouldn't we just take a positive sign?
So if q is positive it will be accelerated to the left, correct? The electric field is pointing to the left. That's a negative acceleration for your coordinate system (which you didn't indicate but I assume the positive x-direction is to the right).

In the above setup a negative charge would be attracted to (accelerate towards) the positive plate.

If you want your "E" to reflect the fact that it points along the negative x-axis direction, you need to give it a negative sign.
 
Aah, that makes sense. However that leads me to another problem, not being able to find a real value for the time:

##\vec E=\frac {\Delta V} {\Delta d} \hat d=- \frac {V_R-V_L} {L} =- \frac {V_0}{L} ##
##\vec F=q \vec E=-q \frac {V_0} {L}##
##\vec a=\frac {\vec F} {m} =-\frac {qV_0} {mL}##
##L=\frac 1 2 \vec a t^2=- \frac 1 2 \frac {qV_0} {mL} t^2 \rightarrow t^2=-\frac {2mL^2} {qV_0}##
 
It's not a problem if q is negative. If q is positive the time will have an imaginary solution since a positive charge would never reach the right hand plate.
 
  • Like
Likes ItsTheSebbe
ooh, yeah that does make sense, therefore it needs to negatively charged. I was failing to see the connection between the image and the formula. Thanks!
 
Back
Top