Problem related to a parallel plate capacitor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to a parallel plate capacitor, focusing on energy conservation, electric potential, and the motion of an electron within an electric field. Participants explore the relationships between kinetic energy, potential energy, and the effects of a sinusoidal voltage on the electron's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy in the context of kinetic and potential energy, questioning the correctness of initial assumptions and calculations. There are attempts to derive time and velocity equations based on energy principles and the effects of a sinusoidal voltage. Some participants suggest using power series expansions for the sine function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications and corrections to earlier posts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of significant figures and the implications of time-varying potential energy on mechanical energy conservation. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the behavior of the electron under sinusoidal voltage.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the precision of values provided, and participants are navigating the complexities of time-varying electric fields and their effects on motion. The discussion includes considerations of significant figures and the appropriateness of using average versus instantaneous values in calculations.

PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
Homework Statement
a. The distance between the plates of a plane-parallel capacitor is 1cm. An electron starts at rest at the negative plate. If a direct voltage of 1000 V is applied, how long will it take the electron to reach the positive plate?
b. What is the magnitude of force which is exerted on the electron at the beginning and at the end of its path?
c. What is the final velocity?
d. If a 60-Hz sinusoidal voltage of peak value 1000 V is applied, how long will the time of transit be? Assume that the electron is released with zero velocity at the instant of time when the applied voltage is passing through zero.
Relevant Equations
F = qE, W = PE + KE
The diagram would look like this.

1607671984338.png

a. The total energy is conserved,
##KE_A + PE_A = KE_B + PE_B ##
##KE_A=0; PE_A =1000##
## 1000 = \frac{m v^2} {2} ##
##2000 = {9.1}*10^{-31}*v^2##
##v^2 = \frac{2000 * 10^{31}} {9.1}; v = 46.8 * 10^{15} ##
##v = at; = \frac {qVt} {md} ; t = \frac{vmd} {qV} seconds##
##t = 2.66 sec ##
b. ##F =q*E = \frac {qV} d = \frac{1.6*10^{-19} * 1000} {0.01} = 1.6 * 10^{-14} N ##
c. ##v =46.8 * 10^15 m/s ##
d. This is a tougher one, one of the hints provided is expanding the sine function into power series
##\sin(\theta) = \theta - \frac{{\theta}^3} 6 ##
The sine function is ##1000\sin(120\pi t)##
##V = 1000\sin(120\pi t) - 1000^3\frac {{\sin^3(120\pi t)}} 6 ##
##ma = qE; ma = \frac{qV} {d}; \frac {mv} t = \frac{qV} {d} ##
##v =\sqrt{\frac{2qV} m}##
Substituting v, i get t. Is the approach correct?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
##KE_A=0; PE_A =1000##
A potential energy (something you might measure in J) cannot be equal to an electric potential (which you may measure in Volts).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and PhysicsTest
Sorry my mistake it is ##U = qV ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
PhysicsTest said:
Sorry my mistake it is ##U = qV ##
Right. So how does that change your answers?
 
The total energy is conserved,
##KE_A + PE_A = KE_B + PE_B ##
##KE_A=0; PE_A =1.6*10^{-19} * 1000##
## 1.6*10^{-16} = \frac{m v^2} {2} ##
##3.2*10^{-16} = {9.1}*10^{-31}*v^2##
##v^2 = \frac{3.2 * 10^{15}} {9.1}; v^2 = 3.5 * 10^{14}; v = 1.875 * 10^7 m/s##
##v = at; = \frac {qVt} {md} ; t = \frac{vmd} {qV} seconds##
##t = 1.06 nsec ##
b. ##F =q*E = \frac {qV} d = \frac{1.6*10^{-19} * 1000} {0.01} = 1.6 * 10^{-14} N ##
c. ##v =1.875 * 10^7 m/s ##
d. This is a tougher one, one of the hints provided is expanding the sine function into power series
##\sin(\theta) = \theta - \frac{{\theta}^3} 6 ##
The sine function is ##1000\sin(120\pi t)##
##V = 1000\sin(120\pi t) - 1000^3\frac {{\sin^3(120\pi t)}} 6 ##
##ma = qE; ma = \frac{qV} {d}; \frac {mv} t = \frac{qV} {d} ##
##v =\sqrt{\frac{2qV} m}##
Substituting v, i get t. Is the approach correct?
 
So for part d, can i assume that the electron will be oscillating between the two plates as the voltage is sinusoidal for positive values of sine value in one direction and for negative values in the other direction?
 
PhysicsTest said:
##V = 1000\sin(120\pi t) - 1000^3\frac {{\sin^3(120\pi t)}} 6 ##
You want a power series in theta, not in sin(theta).
But you already know the answer is of the order of 100s of nsec. In such a short time sine is effectively a straight line.
PhysicsTest said:
##ma = \frac{qV} {d}; \frac {mv} t = \frac{qV} {d} ##
Don't confuse instantaneous acceleration (a) with average acceleration (v/t).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
haruspex said:
In such a short time sine is effectively a straight line.
You mean this ##\sin120\pi t## which is very low frequency(60hz frequency, relatively "big" period 17ms=17Million ns) hence it doesn't change a lot within 100ns..
 
PhysicsTest said:
Substituting v, i get t. Is the approach correct?
Haruspex has directed you well but if I may, I’d like to add a few points.

In your first attempt, you calculated the electron travels much faster than the speed of light but still took over 2s to travel 1cm! That should have signalled that you had made some serious mistake(s) and helped you find them.

The values supplied have a precision of only 1 significant figure. So it makes no sense to give a final answer like ##v = 1.875*10^7 m/s##. Round to 1 or 2 sig. figs. I’d go for 2 significant figures here. (But use unrounded values in calculations to minimise cumulative rounding errors.)

Remember average velocity is half the final velocity (if starting from rest and having constant acceleration). So you could have found the time more simply:
##time= \frac{displacement}{average-velocity} = \frac{0.01}{0.5 *1.875*10^7} = 1.1*10^-9s##

You should be familiar with the small angle approximation which tells you sin(θ) ≈ θ if θ (in radians) is small. ‘θ’ is simply the first term in the power-series expansion of sin(θ). So you know that if the transit time is much less than (T = 1/f =) 1/60 s, you can write:

V(t) = 1000sin(120πt) ≈ 1000(120πt) ≈ 377000t (for small values of t)

Acceleration is no longer constant so you can’t use the simple (constant acceleration) kinematics equations. You will need a little calculus I think.

Be accurate/consistent with symbols, so don’t mix ‘seconds’, ‘sec’ and ‘s’. The SI symbol for seconds is ‘s’. Similarly the symbol for the unit 'hertz' is ‘Hz’, not ‘hz’.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pai535, PhysicsTest and Delta2
  • #10
Thank you for the clarity. The modified equations for problem (d)
##\frac{mv^2} 2 = q * 377000t ##
##ma = \frac{q*V(t)} d => ma = \frac{q*377000t} {0.01} ##
##m \frac{dv} {dt} = q*377*10^5 t; mv = 377*10^5 q \int t dt ##
## mv = 377*10^5*q*\frac {t^2} 2 ##
##m^2v^2 = 1.13*10^{-9} * t^2 ##
##m^2 v^2 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^4##
##m*2*q*377*10^3 t = 1.27*10^{-18} *t^4 ##
##9.1*10^{-31}*1.69*10^{-19}*377*10^3 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^3 ##
##t = 3.57ns##
 
  • #11
PhysicsTest said:
Thank you for the clarity. The modified equations for problem (d)
##\frac{mv^2} 2 = q * 377000t ##
##ma = \frac{q*V(t)} d => ma = \frac{q*377000t} {0.01} ##
##m \frac{dv} {dt} = q*377*10^5 t; mv = 377*10^5 q \int t dt ##
## mv = 377*10^5*q*\frac {t^2} 2 ##
##m^2v^2 = 1.13*10^{-9} * t^2 ##
##m^2 v^2 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^4##
##m*2*q*377*10^3 t = 1.27*10^{-18} *t^4 ##
##9.1*10^{-31}*1.69*10^{-19}*377*10^3 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^3 ##
##t = 3.57ns##
I can’t follow your working. Solutions using symbols (until the end) are often easier to read/follow. Here’s a bit more help than I should provide...

##V(t) = kt## where ##k = 3.77*10^5 V/s##
$$F = qE = \frac{qV}{d} = \frac{qkt}{d}$$Applying F = ma gives:$$\frac{qkt}{d}= m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}$$$$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = \frac{qk}{md}t$$
Integrate twice and you get x as a function of t. Then set x=d and you’ll have an equation from which you can find t.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and PhysicsTest
  • #12
Delta2 said:
You mean this ##\sin120\pi t## which is very low frequency(60hz frequency, relatively "big" period 17ms=17Million ns) hence it doesn't change a lot within 100ns..
No, I mean the slope doesn't change much.
 
  • #13
PhysicsTest said:
Thank you for the clarity. The modified equations for problem (d)
##\frac{mv^2} 2 = q * 377000t ##
##ma = \frac{q*V(t)} d => ma = \frac{q*377000t} {0.01} ##
##m \frac{dv} {dt} = q*377*10^5 t; mv = 377*10^5 q \int t dt ##
## mv = 377*10^5*q*\frac {t^2} 2 ##
##m^2v^2 = 1.13*10^{-9} * t^2 ##
##m^2 v^2 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^4##
##m*2*q*377*10^3 t = 1.27*10^{-18} *t^4 ##
##9.1*10^{-31}*1.69*10^{-19}*377*10^3 = 1.27*10^{-18} * t^3 ##
##t = 3.57ns##
The first equation doesn't hold , because conservation of mechanical energy doesn't hold when the potential energy is time varying. More on this shortly...
 
Last edited:
  • #14
haruspex said:
No, I mean the slope doesn't change much.
Yes well the slope is ##120\pi\cos120\pi t## which doesn't change much with the same logic of post #8...
 
  • #15
Delta2 said:
Yes well the slope is ##120\pi\cos120\pi t## which doesn't change much with the same logic of post #8...
But sine changes much more than cosine in the vicinity of 0. If we take sine as not changing then the electron goes nowhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and gneill
  • #16
haruspex said:
But sine changes much more than cosine in the vicinity of 0. If we take sine as not changing then the electron goes nowhere.
Yes ok, you made me understand that the logic of post #8 is not sound because locally (at the vicinity of 0 for example) the function might be undergoing great changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K