Velocity from electric potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in electromagnetism involving the acceleration of a proton through a potential difference of 0.100 MV and the calculation of its final speed. Participants explore the implications of using non-relativistic versus relativistic equations in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the final speed of a proton using kinetic energy equations and questions the validity of their approach given the high resulting speed. Some participants suggest that relativistic effects should be considered due to the proximity of the calculated speed to the speed of light.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, pointing out potential errors in the original poster's calculations and discussing the relevance of relativistic equations. There is acknowledgment of the need to clarify the correct potential difference used in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the potential difference, with some participants emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting the value of 0.100 MV rather than 100 MV. The discussion also touches on the concept of electron volts as a unit of energy in relation to the problem.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


Can someone double check that this is right? I only multiplied charge of a proton by given potential difference to make the units work, without actually knowing if this is the right way to do this problem.

A proton is accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 0.100 MV. What is the final speed of the proton?


The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,v = \sqrt {\frac{{2E_k }}{m}} = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot 100\,{\rm{MV}} \cdot 10^6 {\rm{V/MV}} \cdot 1.602 \cdot 10^{ - 19} {\rm{C}}}}{{1.67 \times 10^{ - 27} {\rm{ kg}}}}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot 100\, \cdot 10^6 {\rm{V}} \cdot 1.602 \cdot 10^{ - 19} {\rm{C}}}}{{1.67 \times 10^{ - 27} {\rm{ kg}}}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot 100\, \cdot 10^6 \frac{{{\rm{kg}} \cdot m^2 }}{{\frac{C}{s}s^3 }} \cdot 1.602 \cdot 10^{ - 19} {\rm{C}}}}{{1.67 \times 10^{ - 27} {\rm{ kg}}}}} \\ <br /> = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot 100\, \cdot 10^6 \frac{{{\rm{ \times m}}^2 }}{{\frac{{}}{{}} \cdot {\rm{s}}^2 }} \cdot 1.602 \cdot 10^{ - 19} }}{{1.67 \times 10^{ - 27} {\rm{ }}}}} =1.39x10^{8}m/s \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \[/tex]

The final speed is rather high. This is one problem with E&M physics as opposed to mechanics. If a ball was tossed in the air and landed with this speed, I could use my intuition to tell me I did something wrong.

This velocity is half the speed of light. Wouldn't relativity come into play in these types of problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to get the exactly correct answer you would use the relativistic expressions, but as long as [tex]mc^2[/tex] is a lot bigger than the potential energy difference (V) you can get away with using the nonrelativistic formula. That is, you should use the relativistic
[tex] v=\frac{pc^2}{V+mc^2}[/tex]
and
[tex] p^2 c^2 = V^2 + 2Vmc^2[/tex]

... but if [tex]mc^2 >> V[/tex] then the first equation reduces to
[tex] v\approx p/m[/tex]
and the second reduces to
[tex] p^2\approx 2mV[/tex]

so...
 
Ever hear of the unit of energy called an electron volt?(eV?)it's the energy gained by an electron accelerated through 1 volt, so it's 1.602x10^-19 joules. So something with the charge of an electron(a proton!)through .1 MV should give .1 MeV, right?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&q=100000+ev+to+joules

Neato

Anyways, the point of that is yes you were right to do so. However you have an error while calculating it, it's not 1 MV, it's .1 MV don't forget

You found it for, well, one HUNDRED megavolts, accelerating a little proton through that potential difference would be pretty hefty indeed
 
Your v is in the region of the speed of light. If that were correct, you should be using the relativistic form, as olgranpappy said. On the other hand, it looks like your calculation is using 100MV for the potential, but the problem you quoted says 0.100MV.
 
Thanks for catching that. I hate losing points for dumb mistakes like that. Thanks for the info on the eV. I'll look into that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
798
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K