Velocity in Lorentz Transformations

zimbabwe
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I'm reviewing for exams and don't understand when to use which Lorentz velocity equation to use.
one goes

v'=(v-u)/(1-vu/c^2)

and the second

v=(v'+u)/(1+v'u/c^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should probably let us know some details such as how your coordinate systems are labeled i.e. is the unprimed system system 'stationary' or moving, and which direction the moving system is going in. Common usage could be assumed, but I'd prefer not to make that assumption.
 
It looks like you have a particle moving at velocity, v, in some frame of reference, K. Then, you consider another frame of reference, K', moving at velocity, u. Then, the equations tell you the velocity of the particle, v', as seen in K' in terms of v, and the velocity of the particle, v, as seen in K in terms of v'.
 
hmm ok here's the question

two particles move in opposite directions, with one particle at a speed .784c and the other 0.650c as measured by the laboratory. What is the speed of one particle relative to the other.

To get the right answer it's the second equation= .95c

v=(v'+u)/(1+v'u/c^2)
v'=.784c u=.650

the first equation gives .375, which doesn't fit anywhere. So i don't see what it would be used for.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top