Velocity of a spacecraft at relativistic speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a spacecraft traveling to the nearest star system, approximately 4.3 light years away, while considering relativistic effects. The user seeks guidance on how to approach the problem, noting a lack of prior instruction on relativity in their course. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding measurements from both stationary observers and travelers, as this affects the complexity of the calculations. The concept of the "relativistic rocket" is suggested as a useful resource for tackling the problem. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying relativity to practical physics problems without prior foundational knowledge.
Huston
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The closest star system is about 4.3 light years away from Earth. A spacetug is able to move a cargo ship at a constant force of g=9.8N/kg times the mass of the cargo ship for many years. Starting from rest, speed up the cargo ship until you're halfway to the nearest stars, then pull back with the same force to slow the ship down to rest. Determine the maximum speed attained and how many Earth years the trip there takes.

Homework Equations


I'm not sure. I really just need help starting it. We haven't really gone over relativity, and my teacher is giving this project as a challenge. I'm not sure if it's easier than I'm making it, but our book doesn't really have much pertinent information on the subject except that we need to use the relativistic position update equation to solve it. We haven't done any relativity problems in class and I'd just love a push in the right direction!

The Attempt at a Solution


Normally, I'd start with the kinematic equations, but here they end up with wrong answers because they don't account for relativity. Please help me get started! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:
You got yourself a tough teacher if he isn't going to teach you relativity before giving you relativity problems. Ever hear of the relativistic rocket? There should be many threads about it here on PF.

Btw, it's not easier than you are making it to be, unless I'm missing something myself ?:)
 
It may depend on who is doing all the measurements of time, mass, force, distance and velocity. If they are all done by the stationary observer, there may not be a problem. It does specify Earth years and is careful to define the force so that mass does not matter. If some of the values are as measured by the traveler, it is more complicated.
 
FactChecker said:
It may depend on who is doing all the measurements of time, mass, force, distance and velocity. If they are all done by the stationary observer, there may not be a problem. It does specify Earth years and is careful to define the force so that mass does not matter. If some of the values are as measured by the traveler, it is more complicated.
It is looking for measurements from a stationary observer I believe.
 
Comeback City said:
:welcome:
You got yourself a tough teacher if he isn't going to teach you relativity before giving you relativity problems. Ever hear of the relativistic rocket? There should be many threads about it here on PF.

Btw, it's not easier than you are making it to be, unless I'm missing something myself ?:)
I'll go look at the relativistic rocket! I appreciate the help! It's definitely not the easiest class I've ever taken. There's a lot of learning on my own. I had some physics in high school, but this is my intro to physics as a major in University. It seems like this program is going to be intense. It'll be good for me in the long run though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top