Velocity squared veurses distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter enthdegree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around graphing the maximum velocity squared versus the distance traveled for a pendulum at various amplitudes. The graph appears linear, prompting questions about the physical significance of this relationship. It is suggested that maximum velocity squared (v^2) can be equated to gravitational potential energy, leading to the equation v^2 = 2gh, where h is the height. This indicates that v^2 represents an acceleration multiplied by distance, linking kinetic and potential energy concepts. Understanding this relationship can clarify the interpretation of the graph in terms of energy transformations in the pendulum system.
enthdegree
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've calculated the maximum velocity of a mass at the bottom of a pendulum given various amplitudes. I've also gotten the distance that mass falls from it's angle furthest from the extreme to it's lowest point.
I'm being asked to graph the maximum velocity squared vs the distance traveled for a bunch of increasing amplitudes and then interpret that graph.

The graph appears to be linear but I have no idea what physical value it could represent. We have not yet learned in physics what m^2/t^2 values represent over m. Could it be maximum accelleration>>?

It'd be great if someone could clear this up for me, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
enthdegree said:

Homework Statement



I've calculated the maximum velocity of a mass at the bottom of a pendulum given various amplitudes. I've also gotten the distance that mass falls from it's angle furthest from the extreme to it's lowest point.
I'm being asked to graph the maximum velocity squared vs the distance traveled for a bunch of increasing amplitudes and then interpret that graph.

The graph appears to be linear but I have no idea what physical value it could represent. We have not yet learned in physics what m^2/t^2 values represent over m. Could it be maximum accelleration>>?

It'd be great if someone could clear this up for me, thanks!
By equating maximum potential energy (v=0) to maximum kinetic energy (h=0) we have:

v^2 = 2gh

where h is the maximum height. So v^2 represents an acceleration x distance (potential energy / unit mass).

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top