Velocity-Time relationship for acceleration/deceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter grey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the velocity-time relationship for a vehicle experiencing both deceleration due to aerodynamic drag and rolling friction, and acceleration influenced by engine torque. Participants explore different modeling approaches to understand these dynamics, including differential equations and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a model for deceleration based on the equilibrium of forces, leading to a velocity-time relationship expressed through integration.
  • Another method using conservation of energy is proposed, resulting in a different time-velocity relationship.
  • Questions arise regarding the validity of the formulations and the appropriate use of radians versus degrees in calculations.
  • Some participants acknowledge the complexity of the nonlinear differential equations involved and suggest simulation as a possible approach to analyze the problem.
  • A later reply indicates that the initial speed is a necessary parameter for further analysis.
  • One participant confirms the similarity of their results to an established solution but expresses difficulty in modeling acceleration due to engine torque, encountering issues with negative logarithms and square roots.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the initial modeling approaches but express differing views on the challenges encountered in the second case involving engine torque. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to handle the complexities of the equations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for nonlinear differential equations to complicate analytical solutions, as well as unresolved issues related to the application of energy conservation principles in the context of engine torque.

grey
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Not sure if the question is sophisticated enough to be posted here, but here goes...

I am trying to work out the velocity-time relationship for a vehicle under certain conditions. The 'certain conditions' are:
1. deceleration due to aerodynamic drag and rolling friction
2. acceleration due to an engine less drag and friction

now, i will address the deceleration first. I tried to do model this in two ways:
a) Equilibrium of forces giving: -D - f = ma (where D=drag, f=friction). putting in the known values, i get the value of acceleration in terms of velocity as:
a = -0.00075v2-0.2943
i know that a=dv/dt, so re-arranging, i get: dt=dv/a as a=f(v)
Integrating this, i got:
v = 19.8 x tan (((t1-t)/67.3) - tan-1(v/19.8))
now, QUESTION: does this formulation make sense? and second, would the angle be in radians or degrees?

i put in values both in degrees and radians, but found the deceleration to be quite fast with radians and very slow with degrees. By fast and slow, i mean not in sync with practice. For example:
with radians, the vehicle goes from 10 m/s to 5m/s in 15s with a fairly constant gradient. Does it make sense?

b) with the basic conservation of energy equation, starting from:
KE1 - (Pf + PD)xt = KE2
Putting the values in, i got this relationship b/w time-velocity:
t = 666.7 x (100 - v2)/(v x (v2+392.4))
the deceleration (v-t) curve i got was more moderate, with a markedly decreasing gradient
QUESTION: How do these two methods compare?
What am i doing wrong?
What else should i be doing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, both a) and b) look fine. Whichever way you choose, you should realize that you have a nonlinear differential equation. I don't myself know how to analytically solve those (get an equation), though I can get MATLAB to simulate it and plot the results.

What is the initial speed?

Oh, and radians. The radian is the fundamental "unit" for angles. Degrees are derived from radians. Calculators use radians unless you somehow tell it you want degrees.
 
hey tyroman and bluelave0207,

thanks a lot for your replies. I managed to solve the DE and the result was pretty much similar to the one i posted above: v = 19.8 x tan (((t1-t)/67.3) - tan-1(v/19.8)). Confirmed it in some book as well.

However, now i am stuck at the 2nd case:
"2. acceleration due to an engine less drag and friction"
In the solutions to the DE with the added term of engine torque (from the Newton's second law formulation), I haven't been able to work it out properly because there is always some sort of thing that shouldn't be there like the natural log of a negative number or square root of a negative number. Any ideas? I can post my attempts if someone want to have a look...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K