Velocity transformation using the chain rule

Adel Makram
Messages
632
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


How to obtain the famous formula of velocity transformation using a chain rule.
I know that there is a straightforward way by dividing ##dx## as a function of ##dx`## and ##dt`## on ##dt## which is also a function of them. But I would rather try using the chain rule.

Homework Equations


##x=\gamma(x`+vt`)##
##t=\gamma(t`+\frac{v}{c^2}x`)##

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the following chain rule ##\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dx}{dx`}\frac{dx`}{dt`}\frac{dt`}{dt}## so ##u=\frac{dx}{dx`}\frac{dt`}{dt}u`##
The first term ##\frac{dx}{dx`}=\gamma(1+\frac{v}{u`})##
The second term ##\frac{dt`}{dt}## requires me to take a derivative of ##t`## with respect to ##t##. Here the equation, ##t=\gamma(t`+\frac{v}{c^2}x`)## will not help because I have to differentiate ##x`## with respect to ##t##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your chain rules ignores the fact that it is a differentiation wrt many variables. You need the full chain rule with all partial derivatives. An important thing to keep in mind is when t and t' are used in their capacity as coordinates in the Lorentz transformation and when they are used to refer to acurve parameter.
 
Orodruin said:
Your chain rules ignores the fact that it is a differentiation wrt many variables. You need the full chain rule with all partial derivatives. An important thing to keep in mind is when t and t' are used in their capacity as coordinates in the Lorentz transformation and when they are used to refer to acurve parameter.
Here is another trial;
##\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x`}\frac{\partial x`}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial x}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}##
But ##\frac{\partial x`}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial x`}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}##
So, ##\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x`}\frac{\partial x`}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial x}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}##
Substitute ##u## for ##\frac{dx}{dt}## and ##u`## for ##\frac{\partial x`}{\partial t`}##
Also, from the two equation of LT ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial x`}=\gamma##, ##\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{\gamma}##, ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial t`}=v\gamma## and ##\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{\gamma}## (here, I did not use the inverse LT to substitute for ##\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}##, instead I used the main transformation)
yields; ##u=\gamma u`\frac{1}{\gamma}+v\gamma\frac{1}{\gamma}=u`+v## This is non-relativistic transformation.
 
Last edited:
From some help, I found a way out.
First the velocity should be represented by the total derivatives not partial derivatives.
##\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dx}{dx`}\frac{dx`}{dt`}\frac{d t`}{dt}##
Now ##\frac{dx}{dx`}## and ##\frac{d t`}{dt}## are expressed in term of partial derivatives;
##\frac{dx}{dx`}=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x`}\frac{\partial x`}{\partial x`}+\frac{\partial x}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial x`}=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x`}+\frac{\partial x}{\partial t`}\frac{\partial t`}{\partial x`}##
##\frac{dt`}{dt}=\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}\frac{\partial t}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial t`}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial t`}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial t`}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}##
Replacing; ##\frac{dx}{dt}## and ##\frac{dx`}{dt`}## by ##u## and ##u`##, and the other partial derivatives from Lorentz Transformation yields the proper result.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top