Velocity uniformity of rotation in dynamos and DC motors.

AI Thread Summary
Velocity uniformity in dynamos and DC motors is primarily influenced by the external forces and torques acting on them, as described by Newton's laws. The net torque on the coil must be zero for uniform rotation, but this does not imply equal and opposite torques as suggested by the confusion around Newton's third law. The uniformity of rotation is often a reflection of the consistent motion of the external source driving the dynamo. Additionally, variations in rotation can occur, which should be considered when assessing uniformity. Overall, understanding these principles clarifies the mechanisms behind velocity uniformity in these devices.
Entanglement
Messages
438
Reaction score
13
How can velocity uniformity in dynamos and motors be explained?
What's the mechanism of that happening ?
I'm aware that Newton's first law is involved in that situation where an equal and opposite torque must act on the coil during its rotation so the net torque is Zero and the coil keeps rotating with a uniform velocity,
But the mechanism seem quite confusing that needs some clarification, thanks a lot PF in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by writing down why you would expect anything else: what were you expecting would happen?
Then also consider how you know the rotation is uniform ... perhaps it varies a little bit?
The answers to these questions will help us to best answer you, and may help you answer your own question to boot.

Note: Newton's first law would not indicate that an equal and opposite torque would act ... "equal and opposite" is part of the wording of the 3rd law ... but that also does not apply here: reaction forces do not prevent acceleration. Is it possible that this question arises from common misunderstandings about Newton's laws?

A dynamo would be a kind of electric generator - as such, it is usually turned by something else. Thus any uniformity in it's motion will be a reflection of the motion of whatever is turning it. So I don't see much mystery there.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top