Verifying Circuit Calculations: Is It Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The circuit calculations presented are partially correct, with the total current calculated accurately as 4 amps. However, the voltage across the terminals (Vab) should be 24 volts, not 20 volts, based on the correct application of Ohm's law. The current through the 10Ω resistor is miscalculated due to a misunderstanding of the current divider rule; it should be derived from Vab divided by the total resistance in that leg. Consequently, the power calculation also needs adjustment, as it relies on the correct current through the resistor. Overall, the calculations require revision to reflect accurate voltage and current values.
jayjay112
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Please see circut and question at http://www.flickr.com/photos/37144556@N07/3421275866/sizes/o/

Are these calculations correct?


(a)total resistance= 6.25
25/6.25= I total = 4
v=ir 4x6=20v


(b)v=ir so 20/10= 2amps
power=vi so 2x25=50watts?


Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jayjay112 said:
Please see circut and question at http://www.flickr.com/photos/37144556@N07/3421275866/sizes/o/

Are these calculations correct?

(a)total resistance= 6.25
25/6.25= I total = 4
v=ir 4x6=20v

(b)v=ir so 20/10= 2amps
power=vi so 2x25=50watts?

Thanks

Your total I is correct. But the Vab is found either by 4*Req = 4*6 = 24 or by noting that 4*1/4 is 1v and across the terminal Vab = 25 - 1 = 24. Either way works.

In b) unfortunately you have not grasped that you have a current divider with the || network and that the current through each leg is determined by Vab which is 24, divided by the resistance through that leg. You have 15Ω through the leg with the 10Ω resistor. Hence the current through the resistor is going to be 24/15.

Once you have the current through the leg, then you can use your I2R to determine power.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top