Archived Vernier Caliper & Micrometer: Mr.Randall's Sig Fig Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter pgoel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab
AI Thread Summary
For measurements using a vernier caliper, lengths smaller than 1 cm should have at least two significant figures, while lengths between 1 cm and 9.99 cm should have three significant figures. The uncertain digit is represented by the Vernier scale digit, although guessing at the 1000th digit is rarely necessary. In contrast, a micrometer caliper allows for more precise measurements, enabling readings at the 0.001 mm level. This distinction is important for accurate reporting in lab work. The advice provided aims to clarify significant figure usage for better precision in measurements.
pgoel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I asked Mr. Randall about sig figs for this lab, especially on instruments like the vernier caliper and micrometer. This was his answer:

"For lengths smaller than 1 cm, you should get at least 2 sigs: 0.??. (To the 100th place, 0.01.)

Between 1 cm and 9.99 cm, you should get 3: ?.??

The Vernier scale digit takes the place of your “uncertain” digit. I’ve read articles that suggest if the Vernier scale line manages to fall between marks, readers are allowed to guess the 1000th digit, but I’ve never noticed that situation on a scale so small. I’m not expecting any values below the 0.01 place.

But the micrometer caliper scale can give you guessing capability at the 0.001 mm level, so 1.23 cm on a Vernier scale might read as 12.345 mm on the micrometer caliper."

I hope this helps anyone struggling as I was!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for posting this ... it's something I might add to the next lab manual revision. :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top