Vertical and horizontal asymptotes of the curve

mooneh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
vertical and horizontal asymptotes of the curve of f(x) = (x^2+x-6)/(9-x^2 ) are respectively :
a) x=3,x=-3,y=-1 b)x=3,y=-1 c)x=3,y=1 d)x=-3,y=-1


i did the infinit limit to find the horizontal asymptote and i got -1
then to solve the vertical; 9-x^2 = 0 and so x= √9 so x= 3 and x=-3

but the right answer is b) x=3,y=-1

why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to divide the numerator by the denominator because the degree of the polynomial in the numerator is equal to the degree of the polynomial of the denominator.
 
mooneh said:
vertical and horizontal asymptotes of the curve of f(x) = (x^2+x-6)/(9-x^2 ) are respectively :
a) x=3,x=-3,y=-1 b)x=3,y=-1 c)x=3,y=1 d)x=-3,y=-1


i did the infinit limit to find the horizontal asymptote and i got -1
then to solve the vertical; 9-x^2 = 0 and so x= ?9 so x= 3 and x=-3

but the right answer is b) x=3,y=-1

why ?

This is a trick question that instructors like to slip onto exams. You need to factor both the numerator and denominator. You noted correctly that the denominator is (3 - x)·(3 + x), so it is zero when x = -3 or x = +3. However, the numerator can be factored as (x - 2)·(x + 3). There is then a factor (x + 3) which can be canceled in the numerator and denominator. The original function is still undefined at x = -3 , but the function is algebraically equivalent to (x - 2)/(3 - x) otherwise. The two-sided limit of the function approaches -5/6 as x approaches -3 , without having a value at x = -3 . The curve in a graph of this function will smoothly approach y = -5/6 on either side of x = -3 ; the "hole" at x = -3 is represented by an open circle at ( -3, -5/6 ). [EDIT: Sorry -- I re-read your post and see that you have studied limits.]

So when a factor can be canceled in the numerator and denominator of a rational function in this fashion, the vertical asymptote at that value of x is replaced by a "point discontinuity" there. For your function, then, there is only one vertical asymptote. So this is a little something to watch out for on homework or exam problems...
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top