Vertical Asymptotes and squaring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glissando
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vertical
Glissando
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the vertical asymptotes of:

f(x) = (x^2-1)/(x^2-4)


Homework Equations


Limits, zeroes


The Attempt at a Solution


Sorry about the mess...not too sure how to type some of this ):

lim (2^2-1)/(2^2-4) = 0+
x->2+

lim
x->2- (2^2-1)/(2(-)^2-4) = 0+

and lim as x -> -2...

I essentially understand how to do these problems (Find the zeroes of the denominator and find the limit as it approaches that number). What I don't understand is what happens to the (-) when x^2. For example in the above question, when the limit approaches 2 from the left (2-), when you square it does the (-) become positive, yielding 0+? Or does it not follow rules of squaring negative numbers and remain as 0-?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Glissando! :smile:

(is that a reference to music, or to baseball? o:))

The real problem is that you're confusing yourself by writing it like this :redface:
Glissando said:
lim (22-1)/(22-4) = 0+
x->2+

lim
x->2- (22-1)/(2(-)2-4) = 0+

and lim as x -> -2...

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

first, if you use the "2+" (or "2-") notation, that's instead of using lim …

it means "a number infinitesimally above (or below) 2"​

second, it's only the bottom that becomes 0+ (or 0-), not the whole fraction, isn't it? :wink:

anyway, (2-)2 is the square of a number just below 2, so it's just below 4, ie (2-)2 = 4- …

(and (-2+)2 = 4- also, and (-2-)2 = 4+)

you then subtract 4 from 4- …

is that 0- or 0+ ? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Glissando! :smile:

(is that a reference to music, or to baseball? o:))

The real problem is that you're confusing yourself by writing it like this :redface:


(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

first, if you use the "2+" (or "2-") notation, that's instead of using lim …

it means "a number infinitesimally above (or below) 2"​

second, it's only the bottom that becomes 0+ (or 0-), not the whole fraction, isn't it? :wink:

anyway, (2-)2 is the square of a number just below 2, so it's just below 4, ie (2-)2 = 4- …

(and (-2+)2 = 4- also, and (-2-)2 = 4+)

you then subtract 4 from 4- …

is that 0- or 0+ ? :smile:


Oh WOW that just made things a lot simpler. Thanks so much (: *it's music btw.

Thanks! <3
 
Using specific values, if x= 1.99< 2 then (1.99)2=3.9601 so that 1.992- 1= 2.9601 and 1.992- 4= -0.0399. (1.992- 1)/(1.992- 4)= -74.2 approximately. That is enough to tell you that the "limit", as x goes to 2 from below, is negative infinity. Similarly if x= 2.01> 2 then 2.012= 4.0401 so that 2.012- 1= 3.0401 and 2.012- 2= 0.0401. (2.012- 1)/(2.012- 4)= 3.0401/.0401= 75.8 approximately. That is enough to tell you that the "limit", as x goes to 2 from above, is positive infinity. And that means that the limit itself does not exist, even in the "infinite" sense.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top