Vertical circular motion with accelerating centre

AI Thread Summary
In vertical circular motion with an accelerating center, the problem can be approached by applying pseudo forces due to the non-inertial frame of reference. The initial steps involve calculating the velocity at the top position assuming zero tension, followed by using mechanical energy conservation between the top and bottom positions. When the center is accelerating, incorporating pseudo forces simplifies the analysis. It is confirmed that applying pseudo forces and following the established steps is the correct method. This approach effectively addresses the complexities introduced by the accelerating center.
subhradeep mahata
Messages
120
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Suppose, a ball of mass m has to just complete the vertical circular motion when its point of suspension is accelerating vertically upwards with an acceleration g/3. We have to find that particular minimum speed at the extreme bottom that must be given to it so that it just completes the vertical circle.
Relevant Equations
General laws of motion and energy conservation
I can do the problem if the centre is fixed. The steps are:
1) Assuming tension in the string is zero at the top most position, we calculate the velocity at top most position by mv2/R = mg
2)Now, we simply apply mechanical energy conservation when the ball is at the top and bottom positions respectively and find out the required speed.
But, now as the centre is accelerating, I am confused. Do I have to apply pseudo force and proceed in the same way?
Please explain it to me.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
subhradeep mahata said:
Do I have to apply pseudo force and proceed in the same way?
The use of non inertial frames (and hence pseudo forces) is certainly an option, and probably the easier way here.
 
So, I should apply pseudo force and follow the two steps, isn't it?
 
subhradeep mahata said:
So, I should apply pseudo force and follow the two steps, isn't it?
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top