Vertical Mass-Spring Oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equations governing vertical oscillations of a mass-spring system. The original equation presented in the book, F = k(d+y) - mg, is questioned for its accuracy when considering the direction of forces during oscillation. The consensus is that the correct formulation should be F = mg - k(d+y), as this reflects the relationship between gravitational force and spring force during motion. An alternative equation, F = -mg - k(d+y), is also deemed valid depending on the chosen coordinate system. Both equations are correct but represent different perspectives on the forces involved.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

So, I have a doubt regarding the equations for vertical oscillations on a spring.

My book says the net force on the block is: F = k(d+y) - mg.

If we define d the distance at -kd = mg.

I, don't understand, the reason being:

When the block is moving downwards, if its performing simple harmonic motion, it is accelerating upwards. This means that the upward force, that is, that provided by the string, must exceed mg. In this case, the book's formula holds.

However, as soon as the block goes up through its equilibrium position (the one after the mass was hung) the acceleration should be downwards meaning mg is greater than the force provided by the string. Shouldn't the equation, thus read:

F = mg - k(d+y)

Thanks in advance,

Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you, and the book is wrong, As long as k is positive, and:
F=m \frac{d^2 y}{dt^2}
Then your equation F = mg - k(d+y) is the correct one, because the spring force must always be opposite to the displacement. Also F= -mg -k(d+y) would also be correct (where the y-axis has simply been inverted, so that gravity is now pointing in negative y direction).

Edit: also, F= -mg -k(d+y) is a 'nicer' equation than your equation F = mg - k(d+y) since for your equation, y=0 is not the point of equilibrium, but both equations are correct really, its just a different choice of coordinate system.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top