Vertical mass-spring system - force or energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the correct application of equations in vertical mass-spring systems. The equation mg = kD, derived from Hooke's Law, accurately describes the force balance when a mass m hangs from a spring with spring constant k, stretching it a distance D. The alternative equation mgD = 1/2kD^2 is incorrect in this context as it neglects kinetic energy during oscillation. Conservation of energy principles can still be applied, but one must account for kinetic energy and redefine the equilibrium point when analyzing energy in these systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic principles of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of oscillatory motion in mechanical systems
  • Familiarity with conservation of energy concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hooke's Law in various mechanical systems
  • Learn about energy conservation in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the dynamics of mass-spring systems during oscillation
  • Investigate the effects of damping on vertical mass-spring systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of mass-spring systems and energy conservation principles.

stimulus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A lot of problems I see have vertical mass-spring systems, where a mass m hangs from a spring with spring constant k stretching it a distance D, and usually all but one of those quantities is known. But would you equate the forces or the energies, i.e. which is the correct equation to use: mg=kD or mgD = 1/2kD^2, because the two give different answers.

Which is correct? Why is the other incorrect?

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one is correct in general (i mean, unless the spring itself has mass, but that would be ridiculous!). It's just Hooke's Law.

The second one is more complex. Imagine quickly hooking on the weight: the weight is going to start oscillating on the spring, with the center of oscillation being at the point given by mg = kD. However, at that point, the weight's going to have kinetic energy, which you haven't accounted for. Your equation has no kinetic energy: the only way that could happen would be if you gently lowered the block into place. If you do that, you'd be doing negative work on the block, so conservation of energy would not be valid.

If you want to work it out, conservation of energy still holds (in a way) for vertical springs! In fact, you can completely ignore GPE and just write KE + EPE = constant. The only difference is that you have to measure x in (1/2)kx^2 from the new equilibrium point, given by mg = kD. If you want, you can work that out and see why it's true; the new way of defining x accounts exactly for the GPE chance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K