Vertical Rod with two masses attached falling over table.

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a vertical rod with two attached masses, m1 and m2, in unstable equilibrium on a table, which falls due to gravity. The discussion highlights the difficulty in applying conservation of linear momentum because gravity influences the system and the movement involves rotation. Instead of momentum, the focus should shift to analyzing the center of mass before and after the fall. Understanding how the horizontal velocity of the center of mass changes during the process is crucial for solving the problem. The key question is determining the distance each mass falls from the point P as the rod collapses.
DeLaHostia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem is very easy, but there is some conceptual point of view I am missing.
There is a vertical rod of length L without mass on its own that has two masses, m1 and m2, attached at each end standing on point P at a table. The rod is at unstable equilibrium at first. The only force is gravity and there is no friction between the m2 and the table. The systems is moved from it equilibrium, and the rod falls down.

Known data:
m1
m2
Lenght of rod: L
Rod has no mass
No friction with the table
P the point where the rod stands vertically.

Homework Equations


At what distance of P will each mass fall?


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to work this out with conservation of linear momentum but I could not succeed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
 
jackarms said:
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
That can be thought of as using conservation of linear momentum (horizontal component), but not merely from initial state to final state. Rather, one needs to consider how the horizontal velocity of the centre of mass might change at any point in the process.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top