Verticle Banking on a circular track

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnoob93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular Track
AI Thread Summary
A car can be driven on a vertically banked track if it reaches a sufficient speed to avoid slipping. The diameter of the proposed track is 100m, and the coefficient of static friction between the tires and the track is 1.0. The normal force provides the necessary centripetal force, and friction acts to prevent the car from sliding down. The calculations indicate that the minimum speed can be derived from the relationship between normal force, friction, and gravitational force. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly using diameter versus radius in calculations.
physicsnoob93
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED]If fast enough, a car can be driven on a track that is banked vertically. In the view of the 2008 formula one race in Singapore, the government has decided to build one such track. Given that the diameter of the track is 100m, and the coefficient of static friction between the rubber tires and the track is 1.0, calculate the minimum speed that a vehicle can drive along the track without slipping.

Okay so i know that the normal force will be providing all of the centripetal force now, i am just not sure how to play around with friction.

Without friction,

N = mv^2/r
mg = mv^2/r
100g = v^2
v = sqrt(100g)

But what about friction? I know that the friction keeps the car from coming back down on a straight path. So there's friction acting upwards, parallel to the race track.

How would i work with it after that?

Thanks loads
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal force on the car will be the centrifugal force from circular motion. The friction will be stopping the car sliding down the vertical track. Set the friction force equal to the weight of the car and substitute in for the normal force to find v. You actually have the right answer without friction but since the coefficient is 1 that is no surprise.

EDIT: be careful with diameter and radius. I often make the same mistake.
 
Thanks a lot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top