Very simple Vector Problem - confused by 3 vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a vector problem involving a commuter plane's journey to three cities. The plane's route includes flying to City A, then to City B, and finally to City C, with specific distances and directions provided. The confusion arises from needing to find the resultant vector from the starting point to City C, given three vectors instead of the usual two. The solution involves adding the components of each vector separately and then applying the Pythagorean theorem to find the resultant distance. This method clarifies how to handle multiple vectors in a single problem.
07triumphd675
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Very simple Vector Problem -- confused by 3 vectors...

Homework Statement


A commuter plane starts from an airport and takes the route: It first flies to City A located 175 km away in a direction of 30 degrees north of east. Then it flies for 150 km 20 degrees west of north to City B. Finally the plane flies for 190 km due west to City C. Find the location of City C relative to the location of the starting point.


Homework Equations



Ax = Cos(x)(a)
Ay = Sin(y)(a)

So on and so forth --- all the way through Cx = Cos(x)(c) and Cy =Sin(y)(c)


The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is pretty easy to me and I would draw you a picture but I don't have paint on my Mac. Mainly, I'm confused is that there are 3 vectors given here and you are to find the Resultant vector from A ---- > C. I'm used to just two vectors and then finding the resultant vector from A ---- > B. What do you do when you've got an additional vector there? The pythagorean theorem will not work. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


add the three vectors *component-wise* and then use pythagoras on the components of the resultant.
 


Ohhh so add Ax + Bx + Cx and then Ay + By + Cy and then use the Pythagorean theorem accordingly.

Wala. Thank-you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top