Very small question about the Clausius-Mosotti derivation.

  • Thread starter Coffee_
  • Start date
  • #1
259
2
This is the solution to an exercise in Griffiths where one has to derive the Clausius Mosotti relationship:

http://physicspages.com/2012/11/28/relation-between-polarizability-and-susceptibility/

I have one small question about the use of the word ''applied'' at the beginning when defining ##\vec{E}##. As ##\vec{E}## is used it seems to me that it is supposed to represent the TOTAL macroscopic field including both the externally applied field and the macroscopic field caused by polarization.

So basically, I'm asking what is meant by applied here because it seems that they mean that ##\vec{E}## is the externally applied field. If this is so their use of that field seems not too correct then.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,956
3,313
You are right. E should be interpreted as the total macroscopic field, not just the externally applied field.
 

Related Threads on Very small question about the Clausius-Mosotti derivation.

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
589
Replies
2
Views
214
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
494
Replies
3
Views
635
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
808
Top