Very very short question on second derivative

CookieSalesman
Messages
103
Reaction score
5
What does it mean when I have to find the second derivative of a circle at a given point? (Implicit diffing)

In specifics, the equation is 9x2 +y2 =9
At the point (0,3)
You don't really need the rest at all, but it was just my process.

This seems to make no sense.
first D'v 18x+2yy'=0
Second derivative gives 18+y''=0
Doesn't it?
How am I supposed to substitute coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CookieSalesman said:
What does it mean when I have to find the second derivative of a circle at a given point? (Implicit diffing)

In specifics, the equation is 9x2 +y2 =9
At the point (0,3)

This seems to make no sense.
first D'v 18x+2yy'=0
That equation is not the first derivative. You need to solve for y' algebraically.
CookieSalesman said:
Second derivative gives 18+y''=0
Doesn't it?
No. When you have isolated y', differentiate it to get y''. Then, to find the value of y'' at (0, 3), substitute these coordinates in your formula.
CookieSalesman said:
How am I supposed to substitute coordinates?
 
CookieSalesman said:
What does it mean when I have to find the second derivative of a circle at a given point? (Implicit diffing)
Strictly speaking, it doesn't mean anything! You do not take the derivative of geometric objects, you take the derivative of functions. What you are asking about the relation describing the circle.
In specifics, the equation is 9x2 +y2 =9
At the point (0,3)
That's not a circle, it's an ellipse.
This seems to make no sense.
first D'v 18x+2yy'=0
Second derivative gives 18+y''=0
Doesn't it?
How am I supposed to substitute coordinates?
Using "implicit differentiation" as you say, you get 18x+ 2yy'= 0 where y' is the derivative with respect to x.
Doing that again you do NOT get 18+ y''= 0. You forgot to use the product rule on 2yy'. Implicit differentiation gives, rather,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, so if I differentiate once implicitly, I get 18+2yy'
Then, algebra, so that it's -9/y = y'
But if I differentiate that, then I have y prime and y double prime...
Oh, so I can find y prime from the earlier equation, then resubsitute?

Thanks.
 
CookieSalesman said:
Okay, so if I differentiate once implicitly, I get 18+2yy'
Then, algebra, so that it's -9/y = y'
But if I differentiate that, then I have y prime and y double prime...
Oh, so I can find y prime from the earlier equation, then resubsitute?

Thanks.
That's the idea.
 
Back
Top