Vibrations - Rayleigh-Ritz Method Admissible Functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of admissible functions for the Rayleigh-Ritz method applied to a fixed-fixed nonuniform bar. Participants explore the formulation of stiffness and mass coefficients using these functions, addressing boundary conditions and the implications of using a family of functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes the function φ(x) = 1 - cos(2πx/L) but is uncertain about how to incorporate indices "i" and "j" in the context of admissible functions.
  • Another participant clarifies that a single function is insufficient and suggests extending the initial idea to a family of functions that satisfy boundary conditions.
  • A later reply confirms that the proposed family of functions φi(x) = 1 - cos(2πix/L) and φj(x) = 1 - cos(2πjx/L) is appropriate, providing specific examples for i = 1, 2, 3,...
  • A participant inquires about the relationship between indices "i" and "j" when using the Assumed Modes method for N=4, questioning if they need to sum to 4 and whether specific combinations matter.
  • Another participant responds, indicating that N=4 implies all combinations of i and j from 1 to 4 should be considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for a family of admissible functions, but there is some uncertainty regarding the specifics of index combinations in the Assumed Modes method.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of terminology and the lack of clarity in the original source material regarding the number of terms and combinations in the Assumed Modes method.

ThLiOp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm having a bit of difficulty choosing an admissible function for a fixed-fixed nonuniform bar.

I chose the function φ(x) = 1 - cos(2πx/L).

But when solving for the the stiffness and mass coefficients:

kij = ∫EA(x)φiφjdx

mij = ∫ρ(x)φiφjdx,

I am not sure where I should have the "i" and "j" in my function.

In an example for a fixed-free beam, the function that was given was:

φ(x) = sin(πx/2L), which was changed to φi(x) = sin[((2i-1)πx)/2L].

Should I choose my function to be φi(x) = 1 - cos(2πix/L)? And why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your choice for phi(x) defined only a single function. Your process requires a whole family of functions (i=1,2,3,...), each of which satisfy the boundary conditions. Try to use your original idea, but extend it to a family.
 
Thank you for the quick response Dr. D!

So in that case, could I choose a function (like before):

φi(x) = 1 - cos(2πix/L), i = 1,2,3,...
φj(x) = 1 - cos(2πjx/L), j = 1,2,3,...

Where they would end up being

φ1(x) = 1 - cos(2πx/L)
φ2(x) = 1 - cos(4πx/L)
φ3(x) = 1 - cos(6πx/L)...

Thank you!
 
I think you've got it!
 
Great! Thank you so much!

If I may ask one more slightly related question:

If I am using the Assumed Modes method for N=4, for the stiffness and mass coefficients, do the i and j just need to add up to 4?

For example, I could use:

mij = m1,3
or
mij = m2,2

I'm not sure if that question is clear, as the book did not explain how to get the number of terms. If this is the correct way, does is matter whether I use 1,3 or 2,2?
 
I'm not familiar with your terminology, but N=4 suggests to me that i = 1,2,3,4 and j = 1,2,3,4, so that all the combinations are involved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K