Virtual displacement and D'Alembert's principle

AI Thread Summary
Virtual displacement is a crucial concept in Lagrangian mechanics, representing small spatial changes in a system without any time displacement. It plays a significant role in the application of D'Alembert's principle, which is foundational for deriving the Lagrangian equation. The least action principle states that the actual path taken by a particle is one where the action remains stationary, meaning that virtual displacements do not affect the action. This principle helps in simplifying complex mechanical systems by focusing on energy conservation and motion paths. Understanding virtual displacement enhances the analysis of dynamic systems in classical physics.
manimaran1605
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
While deriving lagrangian equation using D'Alembert's principle, in Goldstien, they defined a variable called "virtual displacement". Why do we need a concept called virtual displacement? What is its signigicance in classical physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You can read in wikipedia about it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_displacement

I am not an expert on this matter but from what I have seen, virtual displacements are small spatial displacements r_{i} (with no time displacement) over the path of motion and are used in Lagrangian mechanics.

The least action principle is part of Lagrangian mechanics and states that particles follow a path whose action is stationary, which means that any "small" virtual displacements does not change the action.

You can also read about the least action principle in wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_action



Sergio
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top