Virtual work (internal = external)

AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate that the virtual work of internal forces equals the virtual work of external forces for a beam under a uniformly distributed load, one must analyze the equations for internal and external work. The internal work can be simplified to consider only normal stress and strain, potentially neglecting shear stress. The user seeks clarification on whether this simplification is valid and how to properly approach the external work equation. Suggestions for further steps or rephrasing the inquiry to elicit responses are also requested. The discussion emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of virtual work principles in structural analysis.
disclaimer
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How can one show/prove that for a beam (hinged supports on both ends) subjected to bending due to a uniformly distributed load over its entire length, the virtual work of internal forces is equal to the virtual work of external forces? Given are the length of the beam (L), uniformly distributed load (P = constant), Young's modulus (E), and second moment of area (I).
diagram_ss_uniform_1s.gif


Homework Equations

[/B](I guess)
\delta W_{in}={\int_{V}^{}}\delta \tilde{\varepsilon} ^T\tilde{\sigma} dV and \delta W_{ex}={\int_{V}^{}}\delta \tilde{u} ^T\tilde{\textbf{f}} dV+{\int_{S}^{}}\delta \tilde{u} ^T\tilde{\textbf{t}} dS

The Attempt at a Solution


I think that in this particular case the first equation can be simplified to
W_{in}={\int_{V}^{}}(\sigma_x\tilde{\varepsilon}_x+\tau_{xy}\tilde{\gamma}_{xy})dV
Can the shear stress (τxy) be neglected here? If so, we would get
W_{in}={\int_{V}^{}}(\sigma_x\tilde{\varepsilon}_x)dV
I'm not sure what I should do with the other equation. Am I even approaching this correctly? If not, what are the right steps to follow? Any suggestions welcome. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Back
Top