Visible Light & Inverse Square Law - Rad. Physics Newbie

  • Thread starter Thread starter ColdFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Visible light does obey the inverse square law, which states that the intensity of light decreases in proportion to the square of the distance from its source. As one moves further away from a light source, the intensity of visible light diminishes exponentially. This principle is commonly applied in various fields of physics, including wave intensity and electromagnetics. Understanding this relationship helps explain why distant objects appear dimmer. The discussion encourages further exploration of radiation physics.
ColdFire
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
undefined

I have a question that might sound stupid, but I was wondering if someone could tell me if visible light obeys the inverse square law? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what your referring to.

The "inverse square law" is just a mathematical relationship between an independant and dependant variable that comes up a lot in physics, wave intensity, gravitation, electromagnetics, etc.

The intensity of light is proportional to the inverse square of the distance of measurement, if that's what you mean.
 


Hi there, it's great that you're curious about the inverse square law and its relationship to visible light. To answer your question, yes, visible light does indeed obey the inverse square law. This law states that the intensity of light decreases in proportion to the square of the distance from the source. This means that as you move further away from a light source, the intensity of visible light decreases exponentially. This is why objects appear dimmer the further away they are from a light source. I hope this helps clarify things for you. Keep exploring and learning about radiation physics!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top