Volcanic heat from compression or just friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanisms behind volcanic heat, questioning whether compression or friction primarily contributes to the heating of rock within the Earth. Friction is acknowledged as a significant factor, but the role of compression is debated, with inquiries about the chemical mechanisms that could lead to increased molecular vibration and heat. Tidal forces from the moon and radioactive decay of isotopes like uranium and radium are also mentioned as contributors to Earth's internal heat. While some suggest that the initial heat from planetary formation has dissipated, others argue that it may still play a role in current volcanic activity. Overall, the relationship between volcanic heat and the Earth's core remains complex and multifaceted.
Ulysees
Messages
515
Reaction score
0
The interior of the Earth is hot enough to melt rock. Obviously friction plays a role.

But does compression also heat rock? If yes, what is the underlying chemical mechanism, perhaps an exothermous reaction, that heats rock?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
One must also consider tidal forces between the moon and earth. These gravitational forces also contribute to the heat inside the earth.

As another effect, albeit negligible, one must consider the decay of unstable isotopes, such as thos of uranium, radium, barium and many other trace elements.
 
Last edited:
Any thoughts on how the compression heats rock? High compression should only mean molecules are closer together. Why would this make them vibrate more?
 
Ulysees said:
Any thoughts on how the compression heats rock? High compression should only mean molecules are closer together. Why would this make them vibrate more?

I am not sure as to the mechanics of how compression heats up rock or any other object, for that matter. I only know that it does, sorry for a thin answer. I'd suggest you post your compression question in classical physics, it will be answered easily there.
 
I'm not certain, but I seem to remember hearing that radioactive decay is not negligable, but an important factor. As to compression, you must remember that most all models of planetary formation involve a cloud of gas and dust and small debris falling into a lump. This initial formation causes a great deal of heat and that heat is then trapped as new layers are added.
 
It is thought that original heat of compression has dissipated out a few billion years ago. http://www.me.ucsb.edu/dept_site/vanyo.htm may contribute significantly to the heat of the Earth core.

However, "volcanic heat" is not necesarily related to the heat in the Earth core but is mostly thought to be http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-3121.1997.d01-4.x in "the ring of fire".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top