Voltage at a Point: Calculate Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter forty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and potential at a point using the formula involving permittivity of free space. The user attempts to derive the integral for electric potential, expressing concerns about the correctness of their calculations. They initially include a sine term in their integrand, mistakenly treating potential as a vector quantity rather than a scalar. After receiving clarification, they acknowledge the error and express gratitude for the assistance. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in understanding electric potential and field calculations.
forty
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
http://students.informatics.unimelb.edu.au/serve/cmcleod/stuff/elec.JPG

Eo = permittivity of free space

integral dV = (1/4(pi)Eo) integral (dQ)/a

Hopefully I have that formula correct.

so...

dQ = 2(pi)r(dr)(sigma)

Horizontal components cancel. So there will be a sin(theeta) term at the end of the integral.

sin(theeta) = z/a

and a = sqrt(z^2 + r^2)

and the integral will be between 0 and R

so the RHS becomes...

(1/4(pi)Eo) integral(0 -> R) (2(pi)r(dr)(sigma)/sqrt(z^2 + r^2)) * z/sqrt(z^2 + r^2)

Is this right? I have a feeling I have done something stupid.

Any help greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that's correct. Since they give you the final answer, you can see if you get it when you do the integral.
 
once you pull all the constants out the front you get...

(z(sigma)/2Eo) integral(0 -> R) r/(z^2 + r^2) (dr)

I'm pretty sure that doesn't give that answer.

Any suggestions?
 
Why are you talking about components?...The potential is a scalar not a vector(perhaps you are confusing it with the electric field :wink:)...Do you really have a \sin \theta term in your integrand?:wink:
 
Last edited:
Yerp, confusing sh*t like usual >.<

But that all works out now! Thanks a lot for pointing that out for me :)
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Why are you talking about components?...The potential is a scalar not a vector ...

Oops, I missed that little detail :blushing: Good save, ggh.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top