Voltage change away from long line of uniform charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage change from 5.0 cm to 10.0 cm away from a long line of uniform charge with a density of 5.0 μC/m. The initial approach involved using the formula for voltage, but the user struggled with the integration process. A correct method was suggested, starting with the electric field strength formula for an infinite line of charge, leading to an integral for voltage change. The final calculation corrected the charge density to microcoulombs, yielding a voltage change of approximately 6.232 x 10^4 V. Emphasis was placed on ensuring the final result aligns with significant figures based on the provided data.
Pyuruku
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the voltage change going from 5.0cm to 10.0cm along the radius away from a long line of uniform charge density 5.0 μC/m


Homework Equations



V = (kq) / r (I believe... I'm very lost)



The Attempt at a Solution



ΔV = ∫.05 to .1 2∏rLdL = 2∏r((L^2) / 2 | from .05 to .1) = 2∏r ( .1^2 / 2 - .05^2 / 2) = 0.0235r

Obviously I'm doing this wrong... I'm struggling with the topic of electricity so I apologize if this is too elementary...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pyuruku said:

Homework Statement


Find the voltage change going from 5.0cm to 10.0cm along the radius away from a long line of uniform charge density 5.0 μC/m


Homework Equations



V = (kq) / r (I believe... I'm very lost)



The Attempt at a Solution



ΔV = ∫.05 to .1 2∏rLdL = 2∏r((L^2) / 2 | from .05 to .1) = 2∏r ( .1^2 / 2 - .05^2 / 2) = 0.0235r

Obviously I'm doing this wrong... I'm struggling with the topic of electricity so I apologize if this is too elementary...

Hi Pyuruku, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Why not start with the expression for the electric field strength at a distance r from an infinite line of charge? Then integrate along the path between the two radial distances.
 
Would that be E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi r\epsilon}?

If so...

\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}\int_{0.05}^{0.1} \! \frac{dr}{r} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon} ( ln(r) \bigr|_{0.05}^{0.1}) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = \frac{5.0}{2\pi(8.85x10^{-12}}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = 6.23x10^{10}

Does that seem correct? I can't check the answer for myself (practice worksheet)
 
Pyuruku said:
Would that be E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi r\epsilon}?

If so...

\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}\int_{0.05}^{0.1} \! \frac{dr}{r} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon} ( ln(r) \bigr|_{0.05}^{0.1}) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = \frac{5.0}{2\pi(8.85x10^{-12}}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = 6.23x10^{10}

Does that seem correct? I can't check the answer for myself (practice worksheet)

Fine, except that the charge density is not 5 coulombs per meter, it's 5 microcoulombs per meter. So your result is off by only six orders of magnitude :smile:
 
\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}\int_{0.05}^{0.1} \! \frac{dr}{r} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon} ( ln(r) \bigr|_{0.05}^{0.1}) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = \frac{5.0x10^{-6}}{2\pi(8.85x10^{-12})}ln(\frac{0.1}{0.05}) = 6.232 x 10^{4} V

(I believe this is now correct)
 
Yup, looks okay now. Be sure to make your final result match the given data in terms of significant figures.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top