Why do inductors and capacitors have voltage-current lead/lag?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brendan_foo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Inductors cause voltage to lead current by 90 degrees due to the inertia of electrons, while capacitors lag current by 90 degrees as they require time to accumulate charge on their plates. The reactance of capacitors decreases at higher frequencies because faster changes in current allow electrons to vibrate more easily, encountering less opposition. This is attributed to the behavior of electrons in the dielectric material, which are bound to their atoms and can only vibrate rather than move freely. The discussion emphasizes the physical processes behind these phenomena, highlighting the differences in electron behavior in inductors and capacitors. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of AC circuits.
brendan_foo
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi there... I know that in an inductor, its voltage will lead the current by 90 degrees and for a capacitor it wil lag the current by 90 degrees. I have seen the mathematical derivation for this too , but I can't get my head around what is actually physically happening here.

Why is the reactance of a capacitor less at greater frequencies? Whats happening with relation to the charges on the plates etc.. please someone help me, what is 'physically going on', as the mathematical derivation simply isn't enough for my curiousity...

Thanks all :smile:
Regards
Brendan ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can think of it like in an inductor the voltage (pressure) must come first to overcome the inertia of the electrons in the wire; in a capacitor the current must first pile up electorns on the plates for voltage to develop across them.

Reactance in a capacitor is less at higher frequencies because it is the change in current flow that is felt and higher frequencies mean faster change.
 
brendan_foo said:
...Why is the reactance of a capacitor less at greater frequencies?...
The dielectric is an insulator, so the outer-shell electrons are bound to their atoms. They can't jump from one atom to another, as is the case with a conductor. So the current that flows in the dialectric is due to the electrons vibrating back and forth. They encounter less oposition if they vibrate over a short distance, than a long one, which is the case of a high frequency compared to a low one.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top