Voltage Drop in Circuits with Parallel Components

AI Thread Summary
When a voltmeter reads 4V in a circuit, adding a parallel component can cause the voltage to drop due to the internal resistance of the power source. As components are added in parallel, the total resistance decreases, leading to an increase in current. However, this increased current causes a greater voltage drop across the internal resistance of the battery or power source, resulting in a lower voltage across the external circuit. The phenomenon occurs in all real power sources, not just ideal ones. Understanding this effect is crucial for accurate circuit analysis and design.
physman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When a volt meter is placed in a circuit on its own the reading is say 4v. But when a component, 'x', is placed in parallel the voltage drops. Why is this??

Physman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: cookie's being retarded again.

cookiemonster
 
Last edited:
We already suggested this to our college leacturer and he said there was more to it. Can anyone think of any other explanations?
 
cookiemonster said:
The current is split between the two branches of the parallel part of the circuit. Less current, less voltage drop.

cookiemonster

This is incorrect. You can 500 resistors in parallel with a battery and the voltage drop across each resistor with equal the battery voltage. Likewise, you can add another 500 resistors and the voltage drop across each will still be Vbatt.

I don't know what source you professor was using (battery perhaps?) but real sources have some internal resistance. The more components you place in parallel the lower the total resistance will be thus the higher the current will be (Ohm's Law). Rbatt doesn't change (or goes up as current goes up due to heating) but current goes up thus some of the voltage dropped by the entire circuit is dropped within the battery causing the external circuit voltage to drop. This happens to all sources from huge TG's to tiny batteries.

Edit: If you want to play with this concept, draw a circuit with a 0.1 ohm resistor directly connected to a battery. Draw a dashed box around the resistor and battery so you have a real battery system vice a zero ohm theoretical battery. Put this battery system in various circuits and do some calculations to see the net effect on the circuit. Pretty cool stuff. If you have an Ohm meter at home you can also try this. Plag a wall wart into a wall socket (note the wall wart voltage). Measure the voltage of the wall wart. For let's say a 12V wart, the measured voltage will be 13 to 15 V. Now, put a 1M ohm resistor across the wart and measure the voltage across the resistor. the voltage wil probably be closer to the rated 12V. This doesn't work for all warts because some actually have more sophisticated voltage control circuitry built in, but most el-cheapo warts will respond like this. You put a load on the wart, and the secondary coil resistance will drop some the voltage.
 
Last edited:
Looks like today might be a bad day again. I should just quit while I'm only sort-of behind.

cookiemonster
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top