Volume enclosed by a spherical coordinate surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the volume enclosed by a spherical coordinate surface defined by ρ = 2sin∅. The discussion centers around the setup of the integral for volume in spherical coordinates and the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of integration for ρ, ∅, and θ, with some expressing uncertainty about their correctness. There is exploration of the integral setup and evaluation, particularly regarding the integration of sin^4(∅).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the integration process and suggested using trigonometric identities for simplification. There is ongoing exploration of the calculations and potential errors, with multiple interpretations of the results being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about certain trigonometric substitutions and the implications of their results, indicating a need for clarification on these points. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to verify the correctness of the integration steps and assumptions made throughout the problem.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the volume enclosed by the spherical coordinate surface ρ = 2sin∅


Homework Equations



dV = ∫∫∫(ρ^2)sin∅dρd∅dθ

The Attempt at a Solution




(Sorry about my notation!)

Alright, here's what I've done so far...

Since the region is a torus, centered around the z-axis, I began by finding my limits of integration for ρ, which I think would simply be from 0 to 2sin∅.

For my limits for ∅, I started at the utmost point on the positive z-axis, which I believe is 0 in regards to ∅, and it covers the entire ∅ "region" down to the negative z axis, so the limits are 0 to pi.

And for θ, I got simply 0 to 2pi.

Given those limits, integrating ((ρ^2)sin∅)dρd∅dθ, I wind up with 0, which on the one hand, I've convinced myself makes sense, since it is a torus, and it is symmetrical about the axes (like saying the area under the cosine from 0 to 2pi is 0). On the other hand, a volume of 0 for a physical object simply doesn't make sense.

I have a feeling I'm simply going about the limits wrong. If I've got those right, I'll post my integration work in case someone can spot the problem.

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what you are saying is that your integral is
\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi}\int_{\phi= 0}^\pi\int_{\rho= 0}^{2\sin(\phi)} \rho^2sin(\phi) d\rho d\phi d\theta
Clearly, the \theta integral gives a factor or 2\pi. Also, the integral of \rho^2 is (1/3)\rho^3 so, evaluating that integral we have
\frac{16}{3}\int_0^\pi sin^4(\phi)d\phi
I do not get 0 when I integrate that.
 
Ok, so as far as my limits of integration go, those are ok?

I also get (1/3)\rho^3, and evaluating at 2sin\phi I get 8/3∫∫sin^4(\phi) d\phid\theta. I'm not sure where I ought to be getting 16 from?

As for ∫∫sin^4(\phi) d\phid\theta, I think I'm simply screwing up some basic calculus. I said that integral of sin^4(\phi) is -cos^4((\phi). Should I be using some trig substitutions rather than making that leap?

Then I evaluated that from 0 to pi, which gives me -1 + 1, so I can't even make it to my dθ integral...

Thinking this is a trig substition I'm forgetting...
 
forestmine said:
As for ∫∫sin^4(\phi) d\phid\theta, I think I'm simply screwing up some basic calculus. I said that integral of sin^4(\phi) is -cos^4((\phi). Should I be using some trig substitutions rather than making that leap?

Yes, you should. Start by writing ##\sin^4\phi## as ##(\sin^2 \phi)^2## and using ##\sin^2\phi = \frac {1-\cos(2\phi)} 2##. Then after a little algebra you will need a double angle formula again...
 
Ok, so when I expand (1-cos(2\phi)/2)^2, I get 1/4 - (cos(2\phi))/2 + (cos^2(2\phi))/4

Replacing the last term with a half-angle formula, I have

1/4 - (cos(2\phi))/2 +1/8 + (cos(2\phi))/8

At that point, I take the integral of that with respect to \phi.

I wind up with 1/4*\phi - 1/2*sin(\phi)cos(\phi) + 1/8*\phi + 1/8*sin(\phi)cos(\phi).

Evaluating from 0 to pi, I wind up with:

1/4pi +1/8pi.

Integrate that with respect to \theta and evaluating from 0 to 2pi, I get

8/3(1/2*pi^2 + 1/4*pi^2)

where 8/3 was from the very first integration of \rho.

Hope this is easy enough to follow along in this format. If you could, let me know if the work looks ago.

Thanks so much by the way, I really appreciate it.
 
forestmine said:
I get

8/3(1/2*pi^2 + 1/4*pi^2)

Hey, it isn't my job to simplify your answer. :smile: You simplify it, then I will tell you whether it agrees with mine.
 
Hehe fair enough. I get 2pi^2.

Looks like a nice and neat enough answer -- hopefully that's what you got!

I went through the problem a second time, though, and now I'm finding myself confused about one of the trig substitutions I made. Once I've expanded (1-cos(2ϕ)/2)^2, I'm left with a few terms + (cos^2(2ϕ))/4.

I know that cos^2(x) = (1 + cos(2x))/2. But since mine is essentially (2x), does it become 1+cos(4x)...or am I beginning to overthink this. I think I am...my 2x = x = theta in that trig sub, so I should be alright.

Oh jeez, this is my problem, haha. Over-thinking.
 
forestmine said:
Hehe fair enough. I get 2pi^2.

Looks like a nice and neat enough answer -- hopefully that's what you got!

Yes, that's correct.
 
Thank you so much. I really appreciate all the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K