Volume of a Hollow Cylinder vs Cylindrical Shell

AI Thread Summary
The volume of a hollow cylinder and a cylindrical shell are calculated using different equations, leading to different results. The hollow cylinder's volume is given by the formula (π)(height)((ro)²−(ri)²), while the cylindrical shell's volume is approximated as 2(π)(ri)(height)(thickness) under the assumption that the thickness is infinitesimally small. This discrepancy arises because the cylindrical shell formula is not valid for shells with finite thickness. As the inner radius approaches the outer radius, the volumes of the two shapes converge. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate calculations in physics and calculus.
CStudy
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
In my physics lab, I am asked to calculate the volume of a hollow cylinder. The equation for the volume hollow cylinder below was given. Then, my curiosity made me wonder, is the volume of the hollow cylinder the same as the volume of a cylindrical shell used in calculus? At first though you would assume the answer as yes. However, I have tested this theory using various measurements, resulting in two different results. Can anyone help me understand why Hallow Cylinder does not equal Cylindrical Shell? or maybe disprove my results.

Hollow Cylinder =
(π)(height)((ro)2−(ri)2)
Cylindrical Shell = 2(π)(ri)(height)(thickness)

The subscript "o" means outer-radius, and "i" means inter-radius
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CStudy said:
In my physics lab, I am asked to calculate the volume of a hollow cylinder. The equation for the volume hollow cylinder below was given. Then, my curiosity made me wonder, is the volume of the hollow cylinder the same as the volume of a cylindrical shell used in calculus? At first though you would assume the answer as yes. However, I have tested this theory using various measurements, resulting in two different results. Can anyone help me understand why Hallow Cylinder does not equal Cylindrical Shell? or maybe disprove my results.

Hollow Cylinder = (π)(height)((ro)^2−(ri)^2)

Cylindrical Shell = 2(π)(ri)(height)(thickness)

The subscript "o" means outer-radius, and "i" means inter-radius

Welcome to the PF.

In the quoted text, I've fixed the r^2 terms. :smile:

The first equation is correct for the volume of a hollow cylinder. The second equation is used in calculus to calculate volumes, but what is the key assumption when it is used? You cannot use it for a cylindrical shell of a finite thickness...
 
The assumption is the cylindrical shell's thickness is infinitesimally small. I guess if you think about it, if you was to cut a hollow cylinder down the middle the surface are of one side would not equal the surface area of the other, unless the thickness was extremely, extremely, extremely small. thanks
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
CStudy said:
In my physics lab, I am asked to calculate the volume of a hollow cylinder. The equation for the volume hollow cylinder below was given. Then, my curiosity made me wonder, is the volume of the hollow cylinder the same as the volume of a cylindrical shell used in calculus? At first though you would assume the answer as yes. However, I have tested this theory using various measurements, resulting in two different results. Can anyone help me understand why Hallow Cylinder does not equal Cylindrical Shell? or maybe disprove my results.

Hollow Cylinder =
(π)(height)((ro)2−(ri)2)
Cylindrical Shell = 2(π)(ri)(height)(thickness)

The subscript "o" means outer-radius, and "i" means inter-radius

Well, without access to your results, I can't say if you've done your calculations correctly.

However, the volume of the cylindrical shell, Vshell = 2πrht, is accurate enough when t << r. This volume is calculated knowing the circumference of the cylinder, which is 2πr, and then multiplying that by the height to get the surface area, 2πrh,and then multiplying the surface area by the thickness t to get the volume.

Let's take a case where h = 1 and ro = 1, and let ri vary a bit:

Code:
ro   ri     Vcyl   Vshell  % Diff.
1    0.90  0.5969  0.6283  5.26
1    0.95  0.3063  0.3142  2.57
1    0.99  0.0625  0.0628  0.50

As you can see here, the closer ri comes to ro, the closer the volume of the shell comes to the volume of the hollow cylinder.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Awesome explanation.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top