Volume of a Solid of Revolution

SheldonG
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the volume generated by rotating the area bounded by y^2 = 8x, x = 2 and the x-axis about the y-axis.


Homework Equations


Volume of cylinder, volume of disk.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think this can be solved by subtracting the 'empty' volume from the volume of a cylinder of radius 2:

\pi r^2h - \int_0^4 \frac{\pi y^2}{8}\,dy

I get an answer of \pi 40/3 but the solution provided is 128/5\pi.

I'm sure my arithmetic is not that far off :-)

What did I do wrong?

Thanks,
Sheldon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SheldonG said:

Homework Statement


Find the volume generated by rotating the area bounded by y^2 = 8x, x = 2 and the x-axis about the y-axis.


Homework Equations


Volume of cylinder, volume of disk.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think this can be solved by subtracting the 'empty' volume from the volume of a cylinder of radius 2:

\pi r^2h - \int_0^4 \frac{\pi y^2}{8}\,dy

I get an answer of \pi 40/3 but the solution provided is 128/5\pi.

I'm sure my arithmetic is not that far off :-)

What did I do wrong?

Thanks,
Sheldon

I see an error, but I still don't get the provided answer. I believe the following is correct:

\pi r^2h - \int_0^4 \frac{\pi y^4}{64}\,dy

However I get the answer: 64\pi/5

Thanks!
Sheldon
 
SheldonG said:
I see an error, but I still don't get the provided answer. I believe the following is correct:

\pi r^2h - \int_0^4 \frac{\pi y^4}{64}\,dy

However I get the answer: 64\pi/5

Thanks!
Sheldon
That integral is the correct one. I don't see how you could get 64\pi/5 out of it! Show exactly how you integrated.
 
HallsofIvy said:
That integral is the correct one. I don't see how you could get 64\pi/5 out of it! Show exactly how you integrated.

When x = 2, y = 4, so that's the height of the cylinder:

\pi(2^2)4 - \int_0^4 \frac{\pi y^4}{64}\,dy = 16\pi -\pi\left[\frac{y^5}{(5)(64)}\right]_0^416\pi - \frac{16\pi}{5} = \frac{80\pi}{5} - \frac{16\pi}{5} = \frac{64\pi}{5}

Am I making some dumb mistake here?

Thanks for your help!
Sheldon
 
Your integration is actually perfect.

Just notice that your answer is 1/2 the book's answer. That should lead you in the right direction.
 
Wolf of the Ste said:
Your integration is actually perfect.

Just notice that your answer is 1/2 the book's answer. That should lead you in the right direction.

Hi Wolf,

I noticed that, but I don't understand it. I am starting to wonder if the book answer is wrong, but this is a new topic, and I am not feeling very confident.

If I multiply by two (or integrate from -4 to 4), then I get the book answer. But the problem states that the area is bounded by the X-axis. Multiplying by 2 would give the volume for the object both above and below the X-axis. Isn't that right?

Thanks for your help,
Sheldon
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top