How Is the Volume of an Element in K-Space Determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Master J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Volume
Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to figure out the volume of an element in k-space (free electron gas in a crystal lattice).

In deriving the density of states, dn/dE = dn/dk . dk/dE. My dn = 4pi(k^2).dk / V, where V is the volume of an element in k-space.
I came across the spurious, Dk.Dx ~ 2pi (an uncertainty principle relation), where V was said to be (2pi)^3, but that UP doesn't make sense to me.


Could someone shed some light on this?

The ever so grateful MJ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A relatively simple derivation follows from state counting. Consider a three dimensional cube with periodic boundary conditions and sides of length L. The single particle energy eigenstates are of the form exp(i k x) where k is given by k = \frac{2\pi}{L}(n_x, n_y,n_z) with arbitrary integers n.

Summing over all these states can be written as \sum_n = \sum_{n_x,n_y,n_z} \Delta n_x \Delta n_y \Delta n_z = \sum_{n_x,n_y,n_z} \Delta k_x \Delta k_y \Delta k_z \left(\frac{L}{2 \pi}\right)^3 \rightarrow \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} \int d^3 k.

Thus we may approximate sums over discrete single particles states in a big box via an integral over three dimensional k space with the measure \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} d^3 k.

Is this what you were looking for?
 
Ah, indeed.

The k value slightly confuses me tho. Should it not be k = pi / L (sorry I'm rubbish at LaTeX)??

If we let the electron wavefunction say be sin(kx) in the cube, with the condition taht it is zero at the edges, that gives k = n pi / L. Where does the 2 come from?
 
I used periodic boundary conditions while you are using hard wall boundary conditions. It is true that in your case all the allowed values of k make are \pi n/L but with n positive. Thus compared to my analysis you have a density of states of ( L^3/\pi^3) d^3 k but you're also allowed to only integrate over the totally positive k octant. In my formula I integrate over all 8 octants thus making up the missing factor of 2^3 = 8.

Hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes LunaFly
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top