Volume of Solid: Use Horizontal Rec?

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Find the volume of the solid:

y = 2 - x/2 bounded by y = 0, x = 1, x = 2.

Answer: 19pi/12... I already know how to get the answer but...

what if wanted to use horizontal rec? For instance If I am using the vertical rec... the radius would be y = 2 - x/2... but if I use the horizontal rec would the radius be x = 2(2 - y) ? I tryed this value and integrated from y = 0 to y = 3/2... but did not get the correct answer...

Is it not possible to get the correct answer using horiz. rec?
 

Attachments

  • asasas.JPG
    asasas.JPG
    3.2 KB · Views: 383
Physics news on Phys.org
Miike012 said:
Problem:

Find the volume of the solid:

y = 2 - x/2 bounded by y = 0, x = 1, x = 2.

Answer: 19pi/12... I already know how to get the answer but...

what if wanted to use horizontal rec? For instance If I am using the vertical rec... the radius would be y = 2 - x/2... but if I use the horizontal rec would the radius be x = 2(2 - y) ? I tryed this value and integrated from y = 0 to y = 3/2... but did not get the correct answer...

Is it not possible to get the correct answer using horiz. rec?

Are you rotating this trapezoid around the x-axis to form the solid of revolution?

If so, then integrating w.r.t x is the disk method.

Integrating w.r.t. y is the shell method (cylindrical shells), so the radius is y itself. You will have to break the integration up into sum of two integrals.
 
Yes I am rotating across the x-axis. So is it possible to use horizontal rec?
 
Last edited:
Where can I learn about the shell and disk method? My teacher didnt mention these techniques.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top