Volume of toriodal region (engineering related)

  • Thread starter blackbelt5400
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Volume
In summary, the conversation discusses finding the volume of a torus in terms of height using different coordinate systems and integrals. The torus is defined as a circle revolved around the x-axis with a radius of r and a distance of R from the y-axis. Different attempts at solving this problem are discussed, including using rectangular, spherical, and cylindrical coordinates. The conversation also mentions trying toroidal coordinates, but the speaker is unsure of how to set up the integral. Finally, the idea of using a numerical integration or Taylor series expansion is suggested as a potential solution.
  • #1
blackbelt5400
17
0
Assume that 0<r<R.

Consider the circle [tex]x^2+(y+R)^2=r^2[/tex]. Obviously, if we revolve this circle about the x-axis, we get a torus whose volume is [tex] (\pi r^2)(2\pi R)[/tex].

Now consider a point [tex] y_1 [/tex] such that R-r<[tex]y_1[/tex]<R. and let [tex] (x_1,y_1) [/tex] be a point on the circle. The volume of the solid formed by revolving the region inside of the circle and below [tex] y_1 [/tex] about the x-axis is

[tex] 2\pi [(R^2+r^2-y_1^2)x_1+R(x_1\sqrt{r^2-x_1^2}+r^2\sin^{-1}{(\frac{x_1}{r})})-\frac{x_1^3}{3}][/tex].

Assume that a storage tank determined by this solid is filled to a height "h". What is V(h)?

I have attempted this in rectangular coordinates, but I don't believe that it's possible to set up an integral with these weird bounds. Changing to shperical or cylindrical coordinates will not work because this would introduce an error when integrating the distance from the origin.

I was told to try toroidal coordinates [tex] (\sigma, \tau, \phi)[/tex], and I have solved for the foci and the constant [tex]\tau [/tex] for this problem, but I don't know how to set up the integral.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This problem seems to be ridiculously hard in this form, so I've considered that it might be useful to try to find the volume of an entire torus as a function of height. If we want h>0, then the torus must be shifted up so that it is tangential to the xy-plane.

Manipulating the equation of a torus from Wolfram (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Torus.html), the equation of a torus oriented in the xz direction and translated up a distance of c+a would be

[tex] (c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2+y^2=a^2[/tex],

where "a" is the radius of the tube and "c" in the distance from the center of the torus to the center of the tube.

Finding the volume as a function of height will require a triple integral, and establishing the bounds correctly on the coordintes is essential to approaching this. Since we want to integrate as a function of height, we'll integrate z last from 0 to h. This means solving the equation for x and y first. It seems most logical to start with y. We get:

[tex] y= \pm \sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2} [/tex]

By symmetry, we can integrate y from 0 to the positive form of this expression and double the result.

We now look to the projection of the torus on the xz-plane in order to find the bounds on x. We have the equation:

[tex] (c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2=a^2 [/tex]

Solving for x yields:

[tex] x= \pm \sqrt{(c\mp a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}[/tex]

Again, by symmetry, I believe that we can integrate x from 0 to the strictly positive values of this expression and multiply the result by 4. Combining these yields:

[tex] V(h) = 8 \int_0^h\int_0^{\sqrt{(c+a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}}\int_0^{\sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2}} dy dx dz [/tex]

Integrating y is as far as I can get (which is trivial), and Maple 11 isn't any help. I'm stuck at

[tex] V(h) = 8 \int_0^h\int_0^{\sqrt{(c+a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}}{\sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2}} dx dz [/tex]

Can anyone help?
 
  • #3
Hi there,
I'm a little bit unclear with what you mean by
" The volume of the solid formed by revolving the region inside of the circle and below about the x-axis ",

I'm working hard on this question,
however,
my solution form seems to be different from your,
so i was wondering if i had misunderstood to the revolving issue.

so, could you somehow sketch a graph about it? a simple one will do,
thanks.

Have a nice day,

Regards,
Daniel.
 
  • #4
blackbelt5400 said:
This problem seems to be ridiculously hard in this form, so I've considered that it might be useful to try to find the volume of an entire torus as a function of height. If we want h>0, then the torus must be shifted up so that it is tangential to the xy-plane.

Manipulating the equation of a torus from Wolfram (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Torus.html), the equation of a torus oriented in the xz direction and translated up a distance of c+a would be

[tex] (c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2+y^2=a^2[/tex],

where "a" is the radius of the tube and "c" in the distance from the center of the torus to the center of the tube.

Finding the volume as a function of height will require a triple integral, and establishing the bounds correctly on the coordintes is essential to approaching this. Since we want to integrate as a function of height, we'll integrate z last from 0 to h. This means solving the equation for x and y first. It seems most logical to start with y. We get:

[tex] y= \pm \sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2} [/tex]

By symmetry, we can integrate y from 0 to the positive form of this expression and double the result.

We now look to the projection of the torus on the xz-plane in order to find the bounds on x. We have the equation:

[tex] (c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2=a^2 [/tex]

Solving for x yields:

[tex] x= \pm \sqrt{(c\mp a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}[/tex]

Again, by symmetry, I believe that we can integrate x from 0 to the strictly positive values of this expression and multiply the result by 4. Combining these yields:

[tex] V(h) = 8 \int_0^h\int_0^{\sqrt{(c+a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}}\int_0^{\sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2}} dy dx dz [/tex]

Integrating y is as far as I can get (which is trivial), and Maple 11 isn't any help. I'm stuck at

[tex] V(h) = 8 \int_0^h\int_0^{\sqrt{(c+a)^2-(z-c-a)^2}}{\sqrt{a^2-(c-\sqrt{x^2+(z-c-a)^2})^2}} dx dz [/tex]

Can anyone help?

Have you tried to setup a numerical integration? I'm not sure what transforms you can use analytically but surely a numerical approximation would exist to that function?

You mentioned using maple. I'm a little familiar with it but have you declared the function in maple and then done through numeric analysis found a solution?

Theres also an expansion for the square root of a function as a taylor series expansion. Its possible you could use that and then get the answer to within a given accuracy in so many digits. Check something like mathworld or wiki or some textbook or math repository for the mclaurin series expansion. At least with the series expansion you might get something similar though just looking at I would try something numeric to start with and see what you get.
 
  • #5
danong said:
Hi there,
I'm a little bit unclear with what you mean by
" The volume of the solid formed by revolving the region inside of the circle and below about the x-axis ",

Actually, what I said was "revolving the region inside of the circle and below [tex]y_1[/tex] about the x-axis "

I've attached a picture showing the shaded region that is revolved about the x-axis. Just use the washer method, using the outer radius R(x) as the circle and the inner radius r(x) as the line y=[tex]y_1[/tex]. Then

[tex]V=2\pi \int_0^{x_1}[R(x)]^2-[r(x)]^2 dx[/tex]
 

Attachments

  • shaded region.jpg
    shaded region.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 346
  • #6
chiro said:
Have you tried to setup a numerical integration? I'm not sure what transforms you can use analytically but surely a numerical approximation would exist to that function?

You mentioned using maple. I'm a little familiar with it but have you declared the function in maple and then done through numeric analysis found a solution?

Theres also an expansion for the square root of a function as a taylor series expansion. Its possible you could use that and then get the answer to within a given accuracy in so many digits. Check something like mathworld or wiki or some textbook or math repository for the mclaurin series expansion. At least with the series expansion you might get something similar though just looking at I would try something numeric to start with and see what you get.

The purpose of the paper I'm writing is to establish exact formulas for the volume in terms of height. The current approximations used in these cases are somewhat inadequate and I'm trying to abolish them completely.
 
  • #7
blackbelt5400 said:
Actually, what I said was "revolving the region inside of the circle and below [tex]y_1[/tex] about the x-axis "

I've attached a picture showing the shaded region that is revolved about the x-axis. Just use the washer method, using the outer radius R(x) as the circle and the inner radius r(x) as the line y=[tex]y_1[/tex]. Then

[tex]V=2\pi \int_0^{x_1}[R(x)]^2-[r(x)]^2 dx[/tex]

Oh thanks for your graph it's clear and pretty.
Anyway,
i guess it is the one i had in my paper as well,
i had solved it yesterday when i last replied,
however my solution is a different approach,
so i wonder if you would like to have a look.

Can i work my draft paper into a computer paper tommorow?
as i am having my another paper work right now,
i will let you know when i am published together with my working.

Thanks =)
 
  • #8
sorry for my late reply,
i have been delayed due to some work submission,
btw i had finally make it,
any correction or mistake please inform me,
thanks & have a nice day. :smile:



Regards,
Daniel.
 

Attachments

  • Properties of Riemann Geometry - Circle, Sphere, Torus, Toroidal.doc
    294 KB · Views: 302
  • #9
danong said:
sorry for my late reply,
i have been delayed due to some work submission,
btw i had finally make it,
any correction or mistake please inform me,
thanks & have a nice day. :smile:



Regards,
Daniel.

I like your approach. I haven't looked it over yet, but it appears quite promising. However, I would like to comment that your picture 4.0a shows you calculating the "inside" toroidal region. The problem my paper considers is the "outside". However, I think only a slight change to you method is all that is required. I'll look over it this week.

Thanks,
Kenny
 

Related to Volume of toriodal region (engineering related)

1. What is the formula for calculating the volume of a toroidal region?

The formula for calculating the volume of a toroidal region is V = 2π²r²h, where r is the distance from the center of the torus to the center of the circular cross-section and h is the distance between the two circular cross-sections.

2. How is the volume of a toroidal region different from a cylinder or sphere?

The volume of a toroidal region is different from a cylinder or sphere because it is a three-dimensional shape formed by rotating a circle around an axis, rather than being a solid shape with a flat base or a perfectly round shape.

3. What are some real-world applications of understanding the volume of toroidal regions?

The volume of toroidal regions is used in engineering applications such as designing pipelines, tunnels, and roundabouts. It is also important in understanding fluid dynamics and calculating the volume of fluids in tanks or containers with curved walls.

4. How can the volume of a toroidal region be calculated in a computer program?

The volume of a toroidal region can be calculated in a computer program by using the formula V = 2π²r²h and inputting the necessary values for r and h. Many computer programs also have built-in functions for calculating the volume of various shapes, including toroidal regions.

5. Are there any practical limitations to the volume of a toroidal region in engineering designs?

Yes, there are practical limitations to the volume of a toroidal region in engineering designs. The dimensions of the toroidal region must be within feasible and realistic ranges for the design to be practical and functional. Additionally, the material used for the toroidal region must be able to withstand the forces and stresses placed upon it in real-world applications.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
408
  • Calculus
Replies
16
Views
514
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
324
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
771
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
944
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
761
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top